Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Post-

Structuralism

Post-Structuralism

Topic

Grounded in the concept of overdetermination, even when the concept does not appear explicitly in textual presentations.

Post-Structuralism

recognizes the power of discourse to shape reality (both perceptions of reality and the concrete reality that is perceived

Post-Structuralism

focuses on the concept of overdetermination in which we do not separate theory or assumptions from what is real and at the same time how reality is not separated from theory.

These two always comes together, these two compliments together for theory alone without reality could be pointless without facts and experiences that would suffice these theories as acceptable

Allows us to look at things in a bigger picture, to look at the world by weighing the truths and facts and to see the meaning of everything.

Language

the element to interact with the society and through discourses, certain information are accepted as truth or shut out options that are not accepted

History

Topic

- Started around 1960's in France

- Emerged as an antinomian movement critiquing structuralism

- Reacted against linguistic theories of Ferdinand de Saussure

- Writers included in the movement: Roland Barthes, Jacques Lacan, Julia Kristeva, and Michel Faoucault

Structuralism vs. Post-Structuralism

  • Builds on the insights of structuralism, it holds all meaning to be fluid rather than universal and predictable

  • It is necessary to study both the object itself, and the systems of knowledge which were coordinated to produce the object
  • theoretical approach that identifies patterns in social arrangements, most notably language

  • focuses on the differential relations between the objects they studied rather than the objects themselves

Jacques Derrida

Book of Grammatology

Jacques Derrida

What did he mean by this?

When critiquing something should we take into account nothing but the text?

or that there is "nothing outside the text" where everything is in the text itself and so we must take into account all interpretations?

Topic

Derrida was interested in how the meaning of a given text infers might be as reliant upon what is absent from it as much as what is present

In structuralism, individual words came to a meaning because they do not mean something else

Example:

Example

The color red is called red because it is neither blue nor yellow.

A leaf is called a leaf because it is not a branch or a trunk or a tree

Derrida argued that any use of a given term always carries with it "trace" of its opposite.

for example:

when you say, "I am an adult"

you are also saying "I am no longer a child"

child being the opposite of adult

This means that

there are always alternate possible interpretations hiding there waiting to be discovered.

Deconstruction

Deconstruction

Methodology for textual analysis that questions the fundamental conceptual distinctions for oppositions

Deconstruction

Process of writing always reveals s what has been suppressed

Seeks to draw out hidden meanings beneath the surface

questions binaries of meaning which a less critical reader might ignore

With this thought

These point to the somewhat larger implications of the poststructuralist observation that language is highly flawed.

Language does not always express the meanings we intend

Because its is human creation consider whether it might be open to the same biases of race, gender, class etc.

Example

example

Man is used to describe all of humanity

Adding of suffix to make it female such as in:

Actor = Actress

Prince = Princess

Director = Directress

Binary Language

This creates a clear binary between men and women as two distinct categories of people even when doing the same job

The application of root term (Prince) to men and the adjusted term (Princess) to women clearly presents men as a kind of norm and women as a form of deviation

Language is the medium through which we think and talk about the world

Binary in language helps us to sustain an unequal binary way of thinking about a certain topic

Language

Post-structuralism

Post-Structuralism aims to deconstruct such binaries

In a society that language is the primary medium through which we reach consensus of what one counts as "reason" and "truth", it asks us to question whether such things can ever be objectively decided upon once and for all

Topic

If language is flawed then our conclusions must also be flawed.

conclusion

Topic

Unlike structuralism that views the world as a structured system with regularities that one can observe and identify, it suggests that not everything has a straightforward explanation.

This approach or way of thinking allows us to look beyond and deeper

Post-structuralism takes into account complexities, dynamism and non-linearity.

Due to this, it can be used to rethink ideas and problems.

Importance

The importance of post-structuralism is that it allows us to understand change in a deeper way and from multiple points of view

A post structural approach assumes that the "main thing in the structure is not the structure, but what leads beyond it"

This way of thinking leads us to ideas far from the intended which can lead to changes (not always good)

Identifying the structure of an object under analysis is not the main thing, but rather noticing which parts of it contain contradictions and may thus lead to changes

To begin to understand post-structuralism, one should start by attempting to understand structuralism, as post-structuralism builds upon the ideas of that, keeping some elements and rejecting others.

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi