According to Global Digital Report (2018),
Philippines topped the world regarding social media usage (67 million users).
Source: We are Social
The number of social media users worldwide reached up to 3.196 billion, up to 13% annually.
The number of internet users worldwide in 2018 reached up to 4.021 billion, up to 7% annually.
vs.
Truthful information never got 1,000 tweets.
Top fake stories acquired as many as 100,000 tweets. To sum it up, fake news is more likely to be retweeted at 70%
It's been a good year!
data 2
data 3
data 1
Media and Information Literacy recognizes the primary role of information and media in our everyday lives. It lies at the core of freedom of expression and information - since it empowers citizens to understand the functions of media and other information providers, to critically evaluate their content, and to make informed decisions as users and producer of information and media content (UNESCO).
- It refers to a psychological conflict resulting from holding two contradicting beliefs or attitude at the same time.
- In a post-truth era, facts are disregarded rather than appeals to emotions and beliefs.
- It has the same logic of vaccines where a weak form of virus is injected to a person, to strengthen his immune system against the disease.
- People are challenged to expose themselves with fake news in order to build resistance against it.
- It refers to how the means of human communication influence the meaning of communication.
- Due to the vast change brought by the Internet, people change the way they interact with information online. An unintended consequence of this is the rise of fake news on social networking sites.
Respondents’ Ability to:
• Recognize fake news on social media
• Evaluate the credibility of information on social media outlet.
Respondents’ Demographic Profile:
• Gender
• Academic Performance
• Parent’s Educational
Attainment
• Year Level
Grade 11
Grade 12
1) With regard to the participants’ ability to recognize and evaluate fake news online, is there a significant difference in the scores of the respondents when grouped according to the following variables:
1.1 Gender
1.2 Academic Performance
1.3 Parent’s Educational Attainment
2) Is there a significant difference with regard to respondents’ ability to recognize and evaluate false information on social networking sites considering respondents (Grade 12) who took up Media and Information Literacy versus respondents (Grade 11) who have not yet taken up the said core subject, MIL?
3) Among gender, academic performance, parent's educational attainment, and the core subject, MIL, which variable has the greatest impact towards respondents’ ability in terms of:
3.1 recognizing fake news and;
3.2 evaluating credibility of information on social networking sites?
4) Does the result of the Focus Group Discussion validate the test results?
Ho 1: There is no significant difference among the variables: gender, academic performance, and parents’ educational attainment with regard to respondents’ ability to recognize fake news and evaluate information on social media.
Ho 2: There is no significant difference between participants’ ability to recognize and evaluate false information on social networking sites regardless of whether or not participants’ took up Media and Information Literacy.
There has been little research and literature published regarding fake news and misleading information on social media to date in this area (Kiernan, 2017).
THE NEED OF MEDIA AND INFORMATION LITERACY TO COMBAT FAKE NEWS
GENDER
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
PARENT'S INFLUENCE ON CHILDREN'S MEDIA LITERACY SKILLS
RESEARCH DESIGN
RESEARCH SETTING
SAMPLING PROCEDURE
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
- recognize fake news
-evaluate credibillity of information online
Credibility and Reliability of Instrument
Statistical Treatment