Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

TRUST IN OTHERS, EMPATHY AND COLLABORATION

IMPROV(E) YOURSELF

WARM-UP

GROUP COUNTING

GROUP COUNTING

Our task is to count from 1 to 15 out loud with each group member offering one number at a time.

two people saying a number at the same time,

one person saying two numbers in a row

CHANGE-OVER

CHANGEOVER

Goal is that everyone reaches the other side of the circle

It is not allowed to touch a teammate

Trust in work teams:

An integrative review, multi-

level model, and future directions

Costa, Fulmer & Anderson (2018)

Article one

DEFINITIONS

What is trust?

Trust

Cognitive based trust

affective based trust

Team trust

Team Level

Interpersonal Trust

Individual Level

THEORIES

THEORIES

Incremental

Social Exchange

Social Information processing

Non-incremental

Trans-formational

Social categorization

Calculus-based

Knowledge-based

Identification-based

Swift Trust

MULTILEVEL FRAMEWORK

Multilevel framework

Contextual Factors

Trust in Teams

Team Level Outcomes

Team Level Factors

Team Trust

Team Integration

Individual Level Factors

Individual Level Outcomes

Interpersonal Trust between Members

A multilevel model of trust in work teams.

Trust and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Main Effects,

Moderators, and Covariates

De Jong, Dirks & Gillespie (2016)

Article

two

THE STUDY

THE STUDY

HOW: meta-analyse empirical findings of 112 independent studies (N= 7,763 teams)

AIM: examine the relationship between trust and team performance (whether positively related and conditions where it is important)

WHY:

  • Trust is a fundamental characteristic of any work relationship
  • insights on trust lack coherence and are mixed and sometimes contradictory

THE RESULTS

Hypothesis & Results

Hypothesis 1: Intrateam trust is positively related to team performance.

Moderators that might explain variability in strength of relationship

Factors: Task interdependence, team virtuality, team stability, authority differentiation, skill differentiation

Hypothesis 2-6: Factor X is a moderator in this relation; the relationship is stronger when Factor X is high than when it is low.

Covariates that can serve as alternative predictors for team performance

Factors: Team trust in leader, past team performance

Hypothesis 7-8: Intrateam trust has a unique positive effect on team performance after controlling for the effect of Factor X

Hypothesis 9: Cognition-based trust has a unique positive effect on team performance after controlling for the effect of affect-based trust, and vice versa

THE DISCUSSION

DISCUSSION

  • intrateam trust has a strong influence on team performance
  • intrateam trust should be afforded a more prominent and central role in future models of trust and of team performance
  • interdependence, authority
  • differentiation, and skill differentiation can be understood as moderating factors
  • -->trust matters most when parties are dependent on each other
  • may not hold for all forms of dependence

Moderate, positive impact of trust on team performance, showing that intrateam trust has unique predictive validity above and beyond alternative key predictors of

team performance, and is robust across key dimensions of trust

Whom do we trust?

When do you experience trust?

TRUST

Room for Discussion

Possible ways to enhance trust?

Trust in a VUCA world ?

Exercises

CRUMBLING

CRUMBLING

  • move around an open space
  • at one point when you decide to crumble
  • call out "CRUMBLING!", then crumble your body very slowly and safely towards the ground.
  • keep the person crumbling from falling to the ground

TRUST

TRUST FALL

  • Faller: one member stands on a raised platform
  • Catchers: rest of the group should form 2 vertical lines facing each other on ground level
  • Once everyone is ready and in position, the volunteer should freely fall in the direction of the catchers
  • The aim of the catchers is to catch the faller

EMPATHY

EMPATHY

Def:

"The ability to share someone else's feelings or experiences by imagining what it would be like to be in that person's situation"

(empathy, 2018, In dictionary.cambridge.org )

ACTIVE EMPATHY LISTENING

Sensing

Processing

Responding

ACTIVE EMPATHY LISTENING

listening with empathy by focusing on the intended meaning conveyed

  • build teams
  • each person has 3 minutes to talk about a topic of choice (last vacation, sth that made the person happy, sad, angry,...)
  • partner should try to listen non-judgemental, active and empathetic

Resources

Resources

Costa, A. C., Fulmer, C. A., & Anderson, N. R. (2018). Trust in work teams: An integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 169-184.

De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K. T., & Gillespie, N. (2016). Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1134.

Drollinger, T., Comer, L. B., & Warrington, P. T. (2006). Development and validation of the active empathetic listening scale. Psychology & Marketing, 23(2), 161-180.

Empathy, 2018, In https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/empathy

Keaton, S. A. (2017). Active Empathic Listening Scale (AELS) (Drollinger, Comer, & Warrington, 2006; also Bodie, 2011. The Sourcebook of Listening Research: Methodology and Measures, 161-166.

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi