Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Copy of H10ep Cmax
Chunking by markers
10 S
2 S
marker based group average
Ori
delin
decon
delin
Ori
decon
2 S
10 S
Group and S3 matrices results
2020.10.07
4-8 Hz
8-13 Hz
14-30 Hz
Group Cmax & corr
* Higher coherence value in group level matrices in both length of trials;
* Less between length difference in group level results;
Corr matrices in group level
Cmax in group average with data filtered by frequencies of interests
chunking by lengths
chunking by markers
chunking by epochs
chunking by markers
2 S
10 S
2 S
10 S
2 S
10 S
2 S
10 S
Chunking by lengths
4-8 Hz
8-13 Hz
14-30 Hz
10 S
2 S
epoch based group average
Ori
decon
delin
2 S
10 S
Ori
delin
decon
* Clearer network in short trials with epoch based method;
* Bigger difference between the length of trials in epoch based chunking method;
* Numbers of trials with 10 seconds long are similar in two chunking methods, while shows significant difference in all bands, thus may due to the noise-to-signal ratio.
* No big difference with two chunking methods, especially in 10 s trials; numbers of trials/noise-to-signal ratio in 2 s epochs determine the difference in two methods?
* Difference between length of trials, especially in theta and alpha bands.
4-8 Hz
8-13 Hz
Single subject corr matrices
14-30 Hz
* Higher coherence value in group level matrices in both length of trials;
* More between length difference in group level results;