Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
- only words
- no images
literary devices (i.e. metaphor, description, etc.)
Explaining complex ideas,
- usually in the form of characters' thoughts
- plot (change in the world)
- character (change in person)
- showing how the world/situation has changed (plot-based)
- demonstrating how a character has changed (character-based)
World is threatened
Hero takes action
World is saved
In divided Germany, Stasi officer is tasked with surveilling an artist
listens as artist develops work
and also the small details of his life.
The artist is critical of the regime
(and should be reported). But is a good man.
Officer becomes convinced that artist is "good". He does not report him.
makes the viewer think/feel by using tools of
- significant change
- effectss (music/cinematography/computer graphics, explosions, etc.)
What criteria should we use?
Film represents through sequence (plot)
But the best literature is character-based, not plot based.
"Fidelity" would ignore this aspect
So this is not a good criterion
"An adaptation is not a better film because it is a close interpretation a opposed to an intermediate or loose one. In fact, some people argue that fidelity to a text is a surefire way to make a bad film" (Desmond & Hawkes 42).
This is one of the central questions of this course: what makes an adaptation successful?
To answer this question, we will look at theory, but also many short stories and their film adaptations on a case-by-case basis.
What makes the literary work successful? What do we admire about it?
What emotional or intellectual spark did you experience when reading?
If we could disregard the text, would the film be enjoyable as an individual work of art?
Has it translated the admirable quality/qualities from the text?
If so, what qualities? And what method(s) did the film use to translate them?