Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Western society sees the binary of sex/gender as fundamental and enduring.
"Structural arrangements of society are presumed to be responsive to these differences." (128)
On page 137, they discuss male/female bathrooms as an example of something presented as a natural consequence of the difference between the sexes, when in fact it is a means of honoring, if not producing, this difference. What are some other examples of this in our society? What are the specific consequences related to each example?
Gender isn’t a role (that notion diminishes the act of production), nor is it a display (that notion diminishes the interactional component), but rather it is an expression of the combination of the organized activities within an interaction.
"Gender is not a set of traits, nor a variable, nor a role, but rather the product of social doings of some sort." (129)
Goffman (1976) posits that when people interact with one another, natural signs are expressed, fleeting though they may be, that "strike at the most basic characterization of the individual." (129)
"Goffman sees displays as two-part exchanges of the statement-reply type in which the presence or absence of symmetry can establish deference or dominance." (129)
“Gender depictions are less a consequence of our ‘essential sexual natures’ than interactional portrayals of what we would like to convey about sexual natures, using conventionalized gestures. Our human nature gives us the ability to learn to produce and recognize masculine and feminine gender displays—‘a capacity we have by virtue of being persons, not males and females’” (130)
What elements of this interaction display what West and Zimmerman are talking about?
"Actions are often designed with an eye to their accountability, that is, how they might look and how they might be characterized. The notion of accountability also encompasses those actions undertaken so that they are specifically unremarkable and thus not worthy of more than a passing remark, because they are seen to be in accord with culturally approved standards." (136)
“If sex category is omnirelevant (or even approaches being so), then a person engaged in virtually any activity may be held accountable for performance of that activity as a woman or a man, and their incumbency in one or the other sex category can be used to legitimate or discredit their other activities.” (136)
"Being a 'girl' or a 'boy' then, is not only being more competent than a 'baby', but also being competently female or male, that is, learning to produce behavioral displays of one's 'essential' female or male identity." (142)
"New members of society come to be involved in a self-regulating process as they begin to monitor their own and others' conduct with regard to its gender implications." (142)
"Her sex category is used to discredit her participation in important clinical activities, while her involvement in medicine in used to discredit her commitment to her responsibilities as a wife and mother." (140)
Incumbency into sex catgories is relevant for allocation of action.
Example of the distribution of household and child-rearing tasks.
With sex and sexuality, one must recognize a person before you can begin to erotically enjoy them. Even if you want to be viewed as lesbian, you must first be recognizable as a female.
Bridget: Experience in a daycare with gender reinforcement of children as young as 2
Angela: Difference between 'unfeminine' and 'non-female'
Emma: Gender as ideology
Adam: Internal vs. external perspective of gender performance/display
Hannah: When, if ever, are men discredited in a specific context due to their sex category?
Faith: We can't help but try to distinguish the category for ambiguous-looking people
Nina: Agnes is constantly learning how gender is created through interaction. (Is she any different than a cisgender woman?
“Our purpose in this article is to propose an ethnomethodologically informed, and therefore distinctively sociological, understanding of gender as a routine, methodical, and recurring accomplishment." (126)
"We contend that the 'doing' of gender is undertaken by women and men whose competence as members of society is hostage to its production. Doing gender involves a complex of socially guided perceptual, interactional, and micropolitical activities that cast particular pursuits as expressions of masculine and feminine ‘natures.’”
Yes, people 'do' gender, but they do it in a space with others who perceive it and have expectations about it.
Not so much internal within an individual, but interactional/institutional.