Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
This is NOT a small unmanned aircraft system...
"[unmanned Systems] are a tool that every law enforcement agency would like to have. Whether it's a last child, a lost Alzheimer's patient, a shooter from a window, law enforcement needsd to have the tools to get the job done."
- Eric Holdman,
Emergency Management Expert
Unmanned systems have the potential to survey large areas for a missing child, acres of land consumed by wild fires or vast expanses of water where a boat might be adrift.
Unmanned systems provide public safety officers a tool to safely respond to natural disasters and other emergencies.
A bird’s eye view can enable police to gain a quick understanding of the scope of what is going on in an active shooter situation.
The view from a drone can not only provide the location of the shooter, but also an understanding of the surrounding area, offering valuable information such as the direction the shooter might be headed, escape routes for victims and the shooter’s firing line.
UAVs are also great tools for active shooter situations because they can be deployed from almost anywhere and stored in the trunk of a cruiser.
They can also access areas traditional helicopters cannot. UAVs have an ability to fly lower to the ground, get into tight spots, hover under bridges and structures, and even fly inside buildings in order to help the experts gather as much detail as they can.
Crime and accident scene documentation requires a highly trained crew of forensic experts, including crime scene photographers, who meticulously capture detailed evidence from specific angles under precise conditions.
The exact crime scene must be documented for further investigation, even after the scene is cleaned up. It can take hours, sometimes days, for a photographer to fully document a scene with proper measurement references.
In the case of a traffic accident, this requires the roads to be closed while the work takes place — measuring skid marks, position of vehicles, and other details — all while holding up traffic.
Drones can reduce photographer time to well under an hour. Using a few simple ground measurements as reference points, the drone can fly over the accident to capture images, and the analyst can conduct the accident investigation on a computer rather than at the scene.
Stakeouts are a common police activity — involving hours of waiting and watching.
Drones allow police to see places and things that fixed cameras cannot. Although drones cannot hover endlessly, they can land or “perch.”
Rotors can be powered off while keeping the camera on — pointed and zoomed at the action — from concealed locations where humans cannot reach.
Additionally, there are a myriad of places, like the middle of a field, where there is no vantage point to conduct standard surveillance without being seen. In these cases, a high-flying drone offers the best opportunity to get a solid view of the scene.
Monitoring large events like concerts, parades and sporting events is extremely expensive and requires a great deal of manpower.
All available agents are deployed to monitor various routes and areas where there are security concerns. This strategy leaves many agents covering one single area, watching “nothing” happen.
Augmenting ground teams with drones gives police departments a wider field of surveillance over a large area. Drones can zoom to areas of interest, giving agents the ability to remotely assess a threat, such as a suspicious package.
This type of immediate, crowd-based monitoring can provide police with the vital information needed to make the critical decision to send ground personnel to a location only when it’s necessary to do so.
Today, bomb disposal enforcement units use ground-based robots to investigate suspicious packages. Aerial drones can serve the same purpose.
While drones can’t touch and manipulate bombs, they can provide an initial assessment of the situation and rule out threats before resources are wasted or lives are lost.
This means getting data to decision-makers who can monitor the situation.
Specifications:
Operational Details:
Specifications:
Operational Details:
Specifications:
Operational Details:
Unmanned systems allow agencies to accomplish search and rescue, disaster preparedness, law enforcement, fire prevention and other critical services more efficiently, saving time, taxpayer dollars and lives in the process.
Mesa County, CO spent nearly $10,000 on a manned aerial survey of a landfill to determine the increase in waste over the previous year. The Mesa County Sheriff's Office was able to complete the same survey with a UAS for a mere $200.
Recreational use
Business or Commercial use
Government use
Small Unmanned Aircraft Rule
Commonly reffered to as "Part 107"
• Minimum weather visibility of 3 miles from control station.
• Operations in Class B, C, D and E airspace are allowed with
the required ATC permission.
• Operations in Class G airspace are allowed without ATC
permission.
• No person may act as a remote pilot in command or VO for
more than one unmanned aircraft operation at one time.
• No operations from a moving aircraft.
• No operations from a moving vehicle unless the operation is
over a sparsely populated area.
• No careless or reckless operations.
• No carriage of hazardous materials.
• Requires preflight inspection by the remote pilot in
command.
• A person may not operate a small unmanned aircraft if he or
she knows or has reason to know of any physical or mental
condition that would interfere with the safe operation of a
small UAS.
• Foreign-registered small unmanned aircraft are allowed to
operate under part 107 if they satisfy the requirements of
part 375.
• External load operations are allowed if the object being
carried by the unmanned aircraft is securely attached and
does not adversely affect the flight characteristics or
controllability of the aircraft.
• Transportation of property for compensation or hire allowed
provided thato
The aircraft, including its attached systems, payload and
cargo weigh less than 55 pounds total;
o The flight is conducted within visual line of sight and not
from a moving vehicle or aircraft; and
o The flight occurs wholly within the bounds of a State and
does not involve transport between (1) Hawaii and
another place in Hawaii through airspace outside
Hawaii; (2) the District of Columbia and another place
in the District of Columbia; or (3) a territory or
possession of the United States and another place in
the same territory or possession.
• Most of the restrictions discussed above are waivable if the
applicant demonstrates that his or her operation can safely
be conducted under the terms of a certificate of waiver.
Operational Limitations:
• Unmanned aircraft must weigh less than 55 lbs. (25 kg).
• Visual line-of-sight (VLOS) only; the unmanned aircraft must
remain within VLOS of the remote pilot in command and the
person manipulating the flight controls of the small UAS.
Alternatively, the unmanned aircraft must remain within
VLOS of the visual observer.
• At all times the small unmanned aircraft must remain close
enough to the remote pilot in command and the person
manipulating the flight controls of the small UAS for those
people to be capable of seeing the aircraft with vision
unaided by any device other than corrective lenses.
• Small unmanned aircraft may not operate over any persons
not directly participating in the operation, not under a
covered structure, and not inside a covered stationary
vehicle.
• Daylight-only operations, or civil twilight (30 minutes before
official sunrise to 30 minutes after official sunset, local time)
with appropriate anti-collision lighting.
• Must yield right of way to other aircraft.
• May use visual observer (VO) but not required.
• First-person view camera cannot satisfy “see-and-avoid”
requirement but can be used as long as requirement is
satisfied in other ways.
• Maximum groundspeed of 100 mph (87 knots).
• Maximum altitude of 400 feet above ground level (AGL) or, if
higher than 400 feet AGL, remain within 400 feet of a
structure.
29-29.4-02. Limitations on use of unmanned aerial vehicle system.
1. Information obtained from an unmanned aerial vehicle is not admissible in a prosecution or proceeding within the state unless the information was obtained:
a. Pursuant to the authority of a search warrant; or
b. In accordance with exceptions to the warrant requirement.
2. Information obtained from the operation of an unmanned aerial vehicle may not be used in an affidavit of probable cause in an effort to obtain a search warrant, unless the information was obtained under the circumstances described in subdivision a or b
of subsection 1 or was obtained through the monitoring of public lands or international borders.
29-29.4-01. Definitions.
As used in this chapter:
1. "Flight data" means imaging or other observation recording.
2. "Flight information" means flight duration, flight path, and mission objective.
3. "Law enforcement agency or agents" has the meaning provided for law enforcement officer in section 12.1-01-04.
4. "Unmanned aerial vehicle" means any aerial vehicle that is operated without the possibility of direct human intervention within or on the aerial vehicle. The term does not include satellites.
5. "Unmanned aerial vehicle system" means an unmanned aerial vehicle and associated elements, including communication links and the components that control the unmanned aerial vehicle, which are required for the pilot in command to operate safely and efficiently in state airspace.
29-29.4-03. Warrant requirements.
A warrant for the use of an unmanned aerial vehicle must satisfy the requirements of the Constitution of North Dakota. In addition, the warrant must contain a data collection statement that includes:
1. The persons that will have the power to authorize the use of the unmanned aerial vehicle;
2. The locations in which the unmanned aerial vehicle system will operate;
3. The maximum period for which the unmanned aerial vehicle system will operate in each flight; and
4. Whether the unmanned aerial vehicle system will collect information or data about individuals or groups of individuals, and if so:
a. The circumstances under which the unmanned aerial vehicle system will be used; and
b. The specific kinds of information or data the unmanned aerial vehicle system will collect about individuals and how that information or data, as well as conclusions drawn from that information or data, will be used, disclosed, and otherwise handled, including:
(1) The period for which the information or data will be retained; and
(2) Whether the information or data will be destroyed, and if so, when and how the information or data will be destroyed.
29-29.4-04. Exceptions.
This chapter does not prohibit any use of an unmanned aerial vehicle for surveillance during the course of:
1. Patrol of national borders. The use of an unmanned aerial vehicle to patrol within twenty-five miles [40.23 kilometers] of a national border, for purposes of policing that Page No. 1 border to prevent or deter the illegal entry of any individual, illegal substance, or contraband.
2. Exigent circumstances. The use of an unmanned aerial vehicle by a law enforcement agency is permitted when exigent circumstances exist. For the purposes of this subsection, exigent circumstances exist when a law enforcement agency possesses reasonable suspicion that absent swift preventative action, there is an imminent danger to life or bodily harm.
3. An environmental or weather-related catastrophe. The use of an unmanned aerial vehicle by state or local authorities to preserve public safety, protect property, survey environmental damage to determine if a state of emergency should be declared, or conduct surveillance for the assessment and evaluation of environmental or weather-related damage, erosion, flood, or contamination.
4. Research, education, training, testing, or development efforts undertaken by or in conjunction with a school or institution of higher education within the state and its political subdivisions, nor to public and private collaborators engaged in mutually supported efforts involving research, education, training, testing, or development related to unmanned aerial vehicle systems or unmanned aerial vehicle system technologies and potential applications.
29-29.4-05. Prohibited use.
1. A law enforcement agency may not authorize the use of, including granting a permit to use, an unmanned aerial vehicle armed with any lethal weapons.
2. This chapter prohibits any use of an unmanned aerial vehicle for:
a. Domestic use in private surveillance. A law enforcement agency may not authorize the use of, including granting a permit to use, an unmanned aerial vehicle to permit any private person to conduct surveillance on any other private person without the express, informed consent of that other person or the owner of any real property on which that other private person is present.
b. Surveillance of the lawful exercise of constitutional rights, unless the surveillance is otherwise allowed under this chapter.
29-29.4-06. Documentation of unmanned aerial vehicle use.
1. The person authorized to conduct the surveillance under this chapter shall document all use of an unmanned aerial vehicle for surveillance. The person shall document all surveillance flights as to duration, flight path, and mission objectives.
2. The flight information must be verified as accurate and complete by the supervising person authorized by a court to conduct the surveillance.
3. The flight information required under this section must be retained for five years.
4. Any imaging or any other forms of data lawfully obtained under this chapter which are not accompanied by a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the images or data contain evidence of a crime, or are relevant to an ongoing investigation or trial, may not be retained for more than ninety days.
5. Except for the operational capabilities of the unmanned aerial vehicle system and other operational information strictly related to the technical conduct and physical security of the surveillance operation, a person accused of a crime that includes evidence gathered through the use of an unmanned aerial vehicle system surveillance may obtain all information relating to the person acquired in the course of the surveillance through subpoena and discovery proceedings available in criminal proceedings.
6. Any other person that has an interest in obtaining the documentation required by this section may obtain that documentation pursuant to chapter 44-04.