Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Broset Violence Checklist (BVC) for

Violence Risk Assessment in Psychiatric Hospital

Hyang Ko Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Azusa Pacific University

Background

What is it and how does it work?

  • Violence is common on acute psychiatric hospital
  • Career prevalence rates of being assaulted approximating 100% for mental healthcare staff during their psychiatric experiences
  • Patient violence is related with use of coercive measures (seclusion, restraint)
  • Violence destroys therapeutic climate, upset other pts, demoralize staff and sometimes results in fatal damage
  • The fear of violence can affect quality of Care
  • Lack of research on possible contribution of a structure violence risk assessment to the reduction of aggression in psychiatric hospital

Broset Violence Checklist

– A short term (24h) violence

risk assessment tool.

– Assessment is made

three times daily by

an assigned nurse

(once on each shift).

– Six patient behaviors are

assessed and rated

as present or not present.

Is the Broset Violence checklist effective to decrease violence incidence rate in psychiatric hospital?

Risk levels (sum)

0 = low risk

1-2 = medium risk

>2 = high risk

The highest score

during the past 24 hrs

represents the risk level.

Prediction capacity

Sensitivity: 64 %

(true positive rate)

Specificity: 92 %

(true negative rate)

Kappa: 0.44

Research Summary

What is the point?

Conclusion

References

Abderhalden, C., Needham, I., Dassen, T., Halfens, R., Haug, H. J., & Fischer, J. E. (2008). Structured risk assessment and violence in acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 193(1), 44-50.

Almvik, R., Woods, P., & Rasmussen, K. (2007). Assessing risk for imminent violence in the elderly: the Brøset Violence Checklist. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 22(9), 862-867.

Almvik, R., Woods, P., & Rasmussen, K. (2000). The Brøset Violence Checklist sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability.Journal of interpersonal violence, 15(12), 1284-1296.

Clarke, D. E., BROWN, A. M., & Griffith, P. (2010). The Brøset Violence Checklist: Clinical utility in a secure psychiatric intensive care setting. Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 17(7), 614-620.

Van de Sande, R., Nijman, H. L. I., Noorthoorn, E. O., Wierdsma, A. I., Hellendoorn, E., Van DerStaak, C., &Mulder, C. L. (2011). Aggression and seclusion on acute psychiatric wards: effect of short-term risk assessment. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(6), 473-478.

Early preventive interventions.

- The next shift can expect on-going

preventive interventions for patients with

BVC sums of >2.

- Formulating multiple approach with BVC

of >2 to increase overall safety

  • Reduction incident rate and coercive measures
  • Prediction of violence risk in mentally ill patients and geriatric and elderly with dementia population
  • The BVC is proved to be easy, quick to use and cost-effective.
  • Therefore, the BVC is a great tool to assess violence risk in the psychiatric hospital.

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi