Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
For example, “Citation 530 U.S. 57, 120 S. Ct. 2054,147 L. Ed. 2d 49, 2000 U.S.,” (“Troxel v. Granville”).
This offers credibility to the legal brief.
After the analysis of Troxel v. Granville legal brief, it is evident that structural, linguistic, and reference conventions are important to convey the brief’s purpose.
Through the use of clarity, validity, and the understanding of facts and findings; the brief writer presents significant evidence to show that case of Troxel v. Granville is worth an in-depth assessment.
Linguistic conventions serve as criteria the court uses to evaluate the decisions previously made and what the court will be reviewing.
An important linguistic convention is this brief is hedging.
The genre chosen for this upcoming rhetorical analysis is a legal brief.
This is a field is used to protect various rights from violations by persons, government, or organizations.
The values of the legal field are:
Works Cited
"From Memo to Brief." (n.d.): n. pag. The Writing Center at GULC. Georgetown University, 2004. Web. 23 Nov. 2016.
Martin, Peter W. "Basic Legal Citation." Basic Legal Citation. Cornell University Law School, 2016. Web. 30 Nov. 2016.
O'Connor. "TROXEL V. GRANVILLE." TROXEL V. GRANVILLE. Cornell University Law School, 05 June 2000. Web. 28 Nov. 2016.
"Troxel v. Granville." Case Briefs. Bloomberg Law, 2000. Web. 21 Nov. 2016.
Legal writing includes many genres such as memoranda, letters to clients, briefs, documents, and negotiation letters.
Through the analysis of the legal brief, Troxel v. Granville, the brief writer makes sure to exemplify the structural, linguistic, and reference conventions to convey the legal brief’s reasoning that a case is worth in-depth evaluation.
This convention is used to provide a logical outline of the case.
Image by Tom Mooring