3강 1, 3번
Have you ever failed to point out the positives
because you were so focused on identifying
what athletes needed to do to improve?
It’s an easy trap to fall into.
Coaches who fail to provide reinforcement
when it is warranted assume that
athletes know their work is noticed and appreciated.
Are animals truly protected by existing laws?
Many people, including legal experts, disagree on this question.
The law defines animals as property (, as mere resources or “things” for human use and consumption,)
and this means that it is extremely difficult for animals to get meaningful legal protection.
(
)
/
*warrant 필요로 하다
3강 1, 3번
/
___
( )
______
/(
______________
)/
______
take~ for granted : ~를 당연히 여기다
Animals can almost never win when human and animal interests are pitted against each other.
The mere fact that there are laws that permit something to happen — “It’s legal, so we can do it” — does not mean that no one can challenge these laws and change them as a result of open discussions.
/
At times, coaches are so focused
on helping athletes improve that they take good performance efforts for granted.
Nonreinforcement means failing to acknowledge athletes’ effort, skill execution, and performance improvements.
so ~ that...
너무~ 해서 ... 하다
______
/
강화 반응(특정 행동에 대한
칭찬이나 꾸중)을 하지 않는 것
anyone can change these laws
1. 노력
2.기량발휘
3.경기력 향상
/
( )
Did you know that it is possible for people to privately own great apes?
This should not be possible,
but loopholes in existing laws allow it to occur.
( )
(법률 등의) 허점, 구멍
In reality, when you fail to acknowledge strong effort and performance,
this communicates a negative message to athletes, leaving them to question
whether their effort and improvement are recognized and valued.