Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
“Profitable suppliers are healthy, stable suppliers that lower costs and reduce your supply risk. Reduced costs are great, but it benefits you to ensure that your suppliers are making enough profit to deliver promised goods and services.” - Industry Star Solutions, 2016
Transactional / Collaborative / Alliance
Early Supplier Involvement (ESI)
Similar benefits to collaborative and alliance relationships
Additional Short Term Benefits:
Ultimately, a company must be strategic in deciding how to manage its suppliers, and when it is appropriate to transition toward more of a partnership sort of relationship with them.
These strategies may result in one company having multiple degrees of relationships and partnerships with various suppliers.
Additional Long Term Benefits:
• Make cost data sharing mandatory as a condition of involvement in the development
• Minimize the overhead percentage by scrutinizing how it is calculated, and treating it as direct cost
• Understand all assumptions in the supplier’s cost structure, and document them
• Agree to the right terms, preferring a cost plus fixed fee structure, and having suppliers share their accounting records
• Audit the suppliers books to compare actual versus estimated costs, as well as the assumptions previously documented
• Continuously evaluate cost reduction opportunities with the supplier
Studies of Automotive Industry Giants and They're Suppliers
“The Big Three [U.S. automakers] set annual cost-reduction targets [for the parts they purchase]. To realize those targets, they’ll do anything. [They’ve unleashed] a reign of terror, and it gets worse every year. You can’t trust anyone [in those companies].” — Director, interior systems supplier to Ford, GM, and Chrysler, October 1999
"close-knit networks of vendors that continuously learn, improve, and prosper along with their parent companies.” (Liker & Choi, 2004)
Keiretsu
The company should recognize that for business critical supplies, a closer relationship will likely result in long-term profit improvements, product performance, and cycle time to market.
“Honda is a demanding customer, but it is loyal to us. [American] automakers have us work on drawings, ask other suppliers to bid on them, and give the job to the lowest bidder. Honda never does that.” — CEO, industrial fasteners supplier to Ford, GM, Chrysler, and Honda, April 2002
“Toyota helped us dramatically improve our production system. We started by making one component, and as we improved, [Toyota] rewarded us with orders for more components. Toyota is our best customer.” — Senior executive, supplier to Ford, GM, Chrysler, and Toyota, July 2001
What are the 3 types of relationships according to Burt, Petcavage, and Pinkerton?
Step 6
Honda and Toyota worked to maximize their profits, NOT at the expense of their suppliers
Step 4
Step 5
Step 2
Step 3
Step 1
US automakers began implementing a keiretsu model, however it turned into a superficial, cost-cutting culture, departing from the original essence.
“In my opinion, [Ford] seems to send its people to ‘hate school’ so that they learn how to hate suppliers. The company is extremely confrontational. After dealing with Ford, I decided not to buy its cars.” — Senior executive, supplier to Ford, October 2002
What does ESI stand for?