What are the short- and long-term
goals and outcomes of the policy?
Better Life
Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968
- US “impose” on indigenous peoples and tribal law
by offering protections as stated in the US Constitution
like freedom of religion, etc.
- This policy was seen as intrusive and invasive by the indigenous people.
- This policy changed the way tribes treated their civil and criminal cases, they now had to do procedures similar to an american courtroom like requiring evidence and “pleading”.
- Quality of life
- Positive Social Relationships between
the indigenous people and overall
society
Policy Analysis
- Just & Democratic
- Contribute to greater social equality
What are the administrative auspices
under which the policy will be lodged?
How will the policy be implemented?
BUT...
- The law had all these goals and statements but at the end of the day it was never really imposed because in cases of indigenous peoples the tribal law always overpowers
Main Goal
- Hearings took place prior to this policy being “implemented”
- Hasn't really been successful
- Tribal law still overpowers
- never implemented
- written, but unsuccessful
- tribal law always overpowers
The United States would protect the Native Americans using
the Constitution
Who will be covered by this law?
What resources or opportunities
is the policy expected to provide?
Should we include list of things the Tribal government cant do?
- Individuals abiding by tribal law are supposed to be protected by this law
- This law allows them to question “legality” of tribal processes
How does this policy work?
- The Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 governs
what a tribe can and cannot do within
their self governed communities
What caused the problem?
- Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831)
- Worcestor v. Georgia (1832)
- Talton v. Mayes (1896)
The effects
- Sovereignty of tribal nations
- Violation of individual protection
What was the issue?
- The Bill of Rights wasn’t created for Native Americans
Legislative History
- Indian Removal Act (1830)
- Treaty of New Echota (1835)
- Trail of Tears
- Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
- Dawes Act (1887)
-Curtis Act (1898)
-Burke Act (1906)
- Indian Citizenship Act (1924)
Any questions?
Policy Changes over Time
- Sovereign immunity
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez (1978)
- Writ of habeas corpus
Historical Background
- Tribal government could decide
- Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831)
- Domestic dependent nations
Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968
Historical Background
- Protect tribe members like Americans are protected
- Protect only some of their American rights
- Has differences from Bill of Rights
- Signed into law on April 11, 1968 by Lyndon B. Johnson
- Applied some of the Bills of Rights to members of Native American tribes
Historical Problems
- Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831)
- Worcester v. Georgia (1832)
- Talton v. Mayes (1896)
- No corruption
- No outside interference
- 1960 case hearings
Alexandra Bobbitt, Rachel Bryan, Taylor Ortiz, MyLynda Stubblefield