Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
-There are varying reasons that lead us to perceive
visual art the way that we do making it generally subjective.
-If it is not "Aesthetically Satisfying" is it still art?
-Is the way the art is perceived by the eye the sole reason we appreciate it?
-Similar to other aspects of ones life, "does beauty really matter?" OR "beauty isn't everything"
EMOTION
→
Does this image have any correlation with the banality of evil?
→
Do you think it is always better to know biographical details of the artist and historical context in order to appreciate said piece of art?
→What does the artist’s background say about the market value of the piece?
→Can we dismiss the work of an artists/ author just because we do not agree with their particular political and sociological views?
-Using only Emotion as a way of knowing isolates the mind of other potential areas of the brain
-Shortsighted and Unreliable
is an art collector really just
another word for
“brand whore”?
1) Internal Factors
2) External Factors
-Background info of the artist
-Culture
-Personality
-Experience
-color
-contrast/tension
-repetition
-line
-texture
-space
The average materialistic consumer, no matter what they are consuming, looks for 3 things:
1- Name associated with the product (the brand)
2- The reputation of that name or of the concept of the product
-Aristotle was a famous philosopher,
scientist and mathematician in the
classical period in Greece
-He believed that the use of reason
by artists to derive principles and
universal truths about existence was
indeed factual based on evidence
according to the other ways of knowing.
*Plato believed that art
disabled the knower to
properly use reason
*Plato distrusted art as a
source of truth.
3- What acquiring that product will do for their social status
-Art is not logical nor analytical however emotional
-Artist's use their emotions combined with their creative
mind to deduct ultimate conclusions about world as we perceive it to be.
-Claims to knowledge regarding art have evolved through the centuries as great philosophers have aged.
1) Is a piece of work good because of how it looks or because of the deeper meaning it holds/the meaning within?
2) What makes art good?
3) If art is a form of self-expression/liberation, how can someone else judge your work?
4) As much as we don’t want it to be, is art just as materialistic as everything else in life?
5) Is only the artist’s interpretation of their work correct, or is viewers’ interpretation correct?
6) What makes something a good or valid interpretation?
7) Would art possess meaning without viewers/spectators?
8) How is good art recognized or decided on?
9) Why is some art better/more expensive?
C O N C L U S I O N
REASON
1) REASON
2) EMOTION
3) LANGUAGE
4) SENSE
PERCEPTION
SENSE PERCEPTION
LANGUAGE
Q U E S T I O N S