Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Normative Sample
Hayward, D. V., Stewart, G. E., Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P., & Lovell, M. A. (2008). Test review: Test of early reading ability (TERA-3). Language, Phonological Awareness, and Reading Test Directory (pp. 1-6). Edmonton, AB: Canadian Centre for Research on Literacy. Retrieved [11/8/2014] from http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/elementaryed/ccrl.cfm.
Reid, D. K., Hresko, W. P., & Hammill, D. D. (2001). TERA 3 Examiner's Manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Waters, A.M. A Review of the Test of Early Reading Ability- Third Edition (TERA-3). Retrieved [11/8/2014] from http://www.mrswatersworld.com/mat-portfolio/Exhibit%20P.pdf
Norming was conducted between February 1999 and April 2000.
Total Number: 875
Number and Age: The sample was stratified by age as follows: 3 years (N = 89), 4 years (N=104), 5 years (N= 160), 6 years (N=231), 7 years (N=186), 8 years (N=105)
Location: 22 states
Demographics: 1999 U.S. census data
Rural/Urban: 80% urban and 20% rural
SES: SES was determined by family income range.
Other: The level of parental educational attainment was also used.
Published in 2001 by Pro Ed Inc in Austin, Tx
Test kit includes: Examiners Manual, Form A and Form B picture books, Form A and Form B record booklets (protocol)
Instrument ranges in ages from 3yrs, 6m- 8yrs, 6m
Administration time: Approximately 30 mins
-Provide early intervention by identifying children significantly below peers in reading development
-Identify reading strengths/ weaknesses to inform instruction
-Document the progress of early intervention strategies on learning
-Inform research to guide reading development, instruction, and intervention
-Accompany other assessment techniques
1. Alphabet
2. Conventions
3. Meaning
-Measures knowledge of the alphabet and sound- letter correspondence
- letter name knowledge
-initial/ final sound
-sounds and syllables (printed words)
-letters printed in different fonts
- 29 items
Section I and II
Section III and IV
Areas Tested Within Components
- Measures ability to comprehend printed material items
-relational vocabulary
- sentence construction
- paraphrasing
- 30 items
- Measures familiarity with print
- book handling
-print conventions
- punctuation, capitalization, spelling
- 21 items
-Components can be administered in any order, preference is to administer in order of the Examiner Record Booklet
-Components are not timed
-Begin at component Entry Points (based on child’s age)
Identical for Form A and Form B
Basal: 3 items in a row at Entry Point
Ceiling: 3 missed items in a row
If basal not attained at Entry Point test downward (previous items) until basal is attained
- Easy to use
- Quick administration
- Engaging
- Affordable
-High level of validity and reliability
- Overall directions concise and understandable
Content Sampling: .83- .95
Time Sampling: .92- .97
Interscorer Difference: .99
-Each item passed is scored 1, incorrect items are scored 0
- Manually calculate subtest raw scores
-Provide age and grade equivalent (Appendix D)
-Standard scores and percentiles (Appendix A)
Standard score of 3 subtest combine for a Reading Quotient
SEM: 1
Confidence Interval: 68%
Content- description, criterion prediction, and construct- identification validity all fall within the .81 range overall
- Not comprehensive enough to be a stand alone tool for assessment
Minimum standard for test reliability should be .90.
22 out of the 24 reach or exceed .90