Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Zimbardo did not know himself what would happen in the experiment. Participants were not protected from psychological harm which violates ethical guideline two, which deals with the fact that there can’t be any danger (physical or mental) during the experiment.
"The purpose [of the experiment] was to understand the development of norms and the effects of roles, labels, and social expectations in a simulated prison environment."
-Philip Zimbardo
the prison guards were escalating their abuse towards the prisoners in the middle of the night when they thought no researchers were watching.
There was psychological harm.
People will readily conform to the social roles they are expected to play, especially if the roles are as strongly stereotyped as those of the prison guards. The “prison” environment was an important factor in creating the guards’ brutal behavior. None of the participants who acted as guards showed these tendencies before the study. So we can conclude that the findings support the situational explanation of behavior rather than the dispositional one.
Subjects were randomly assigned to play the role of "prisoner" or "guard". Those assigned to play the role of guard were given sticks and sunglasses. The other students played the prisoner role and were arrested by the Palo Alto police department, forced to wear chains and prison garments, and moved to the basement of the Stanford psychology department, which had been converted into a makeshift jail.