The Role of the Federal Government
in Relation to the Civil Rights Movement
(1953-1968)
By: Helena Fernández, Sofía Downie, Paula Velayos, Jayson Figueiredo,
Viktor Abrashev, George González and Juan Aguirre.
Federal
Government
of the USA
CIVIL RIGHTS ACT INITIATED
1963
President
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER
at the beginning of his presidency.
Towards the END OF HIS PRESIDENCY
"Laissez-faire" in a social context:
not the government's task to get involved
in the Civil Rights movement.
EISENHOWER becomes much more interventionalist and proposes two different
Civil Rights Acts:
1957 Civil Rights Act
Bi-partisan committee set up to monitor voting rights of African Americans.
Those found guilty of preventing African Americans to vote would face penalties such as
$1000 or 6 months in jail.
1960 Civil Rights Act
Allows bi-partisan committees to keep records of voter registration in order to be able to monitor
more accurately.
The Acts managed to increase the proportion of African Americans by 3%.
“Peace and justice are two sides of the same coin.”
President
JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY
Sympathetic to the Civil Rights movement
from the very beginning.
"There are no ‘white’ or ‘coloured’ signs on the foxholes or graveyards of battle."
Highly advertised phone call to Coretta King
during his presidential campaign (1960).
Appoints 5 African American judges to
federal courts and creates the CEEO.
The Birmingham Campaign (1963) pushes him towards promising an end to segregation through
a final Civil Rights Act. The March on Washington D.C. (1963) reinforces his willingness
to pass the Act.
Kennedy is tragically assassinated before fulfilling his aim.
Coretta King
President
LYNDON B. JOHNSON
Implements a range of measures collectively known as
the "Great Society", aiming at making the USA a
fairer country.
Civil Rights legislation is to be comprised
among the "Great Society" measures.
"The vote is the most
powerful
instrument ever devised by man
for breaking down injustice and
destroying the terrible walls
which imprison men because they
are different from other men."
The Role of the US Congress
1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
End to legal Segregation in the South.
73% of USA's SENATORS in favour of 1964 Civil Rights Act.
1968 FAIR HOUSING ACT
1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT
Outlaws discrimination of any form in the
sale/rental of housing, thus addressing the issue
of ghettoisation.
66% of USA's MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
in favour of 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Abolishes the power of local Authorities to outlaw African
Americans from voting.
1965 ELEMENTARY & SECONDARY
EDUCATION ACT
+
1965 HIGHER EDUCATION ACT
Financially helped Southern States + Schools with a high proportion of African American students + individual African American
students at college/university.
Reasons why the Congress acquired a positive attitude towards
the Civil Rights movement:
The Birmingham Campaign (1963)
Exposed the extent of racial segregation.
Overwhelming Public Support for the Civil Rights Campaigns
The Congress could no longer oppose the movement.
Johnson's Expertise
Johnson successfully persuaded members of the Congress (e.g.: Everett Dirksen)
to support Civil Rights legislation.
1964 Congressional Elections
After the elections, some conservative Southern Democrats were replaced
by more liberal ones.
Kennedy's Legacy
Johnson convinced the Congress that the Acts would honour Kennedy's unconcluded work.
Washington's D.C. obelisk,
facing Capitol Hill.
Without the interlinked effort of the three institutions
playing a role in the Federal Government, the end of Segregation
might not have been easy to achieve.
The Supreme Court
- Brown Vs. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)
- Brown II (1955)
- Browder Vs. Gayle (1956)
Headline: "HIGH COURT BANS SEGREGATION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS."
Legally destroyed the basis
of Segregation. Campaigners
later on made use of these
rulings to bring about de facto
change across the United States
of America.
Earl Warren:
His appointment on behalf
of Eisenhower in 1953 was crucial.