MOOCs And Publishing
Demystifying the Library
Library Services
The MOOCs conversation is a publishing conversation because....
MOOCs are published
[complex, multifaceted, digital] resources
MOOCs student need access to [copyrighted, published] resources
Libraries can support 'disruptive innovation' is by disrupting library processes & collapsing arbitrary division between patron facing and back end services.
Public Service
- Information literacy initiatives
- Bibliographic instruction
- Academic reference / research support
- Embedded librarianship / co-teaching initiatives
- Outreach, public programs, exhibits
- Acquisitions and licensing
- Policy development
- Resource delivery infrastructure
- Resource creation
- Rights management
- Digital asset management
Technical Service
Seeing the Trees
for the Forest
Disruptions in publishing models
Media
over saturation
DIY Culture
Value & cost of a degree
'Customized Education' Practices
The Rights Stuff
Library Services Disrupted
THEN: oWNERSHIP AND tRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP IS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD
Availability of data
QUESTIONS?
Changes to Information Literacy paradigms
New pedagogical contexts
The Rights Stuff
https://www.cuny.edu/about/administration/offices/la/intellectual_property_9.20.11.pdf
How we learn
Twitter: @nora_almeida
Email: nora.almeida@baruch.cuny.edu
How we teach
Flipped Classrooms
MOOC as Microcosm
- Librarian as publisher
- Academic Commons
- Institutional repository
- Open Textbook programs
- Librarian as consultant
- Intellectual property & copyright adviser
- Librarian as advocate
- OA & OER policy development
- Negotiate licenses for new educational contexts
- Prevent piracy that threatens flexible license arrangements.
- Librarian as designer
- Instructional design support
As a 'disruptive innovation' MOOCs present an opportunity for revisiting the relationships between publishing and pedagogy and technology.
MOOCs were not
created in a vacuum
How we deliver resources
As a 'disruptive innovation' MOOCs are a force that render former knowledge production and dissemination models ineffective.
MOOC as Microcosm
nOW: oWNERSHIP IS COMPLEX. iNDIRECT RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DIFFERENT moocS STAKEHOLDERS ONLY FURTHER COMPLICATE WHO OWNS WHAT AND WHO IS RESPONSIBLE TO WHOM.
Rise of distance education initiatives
Where the Library Comes in
Access to higher education
UPenn: Educating Faculty
Changing student expectations
Not all MOOCS are Created Equal
Changes in resource formats
Extra-Institutional Impact:
Disrupting Publishing
CUNY: Supporting OA
Publishing & Policy
http://guides.library.upenn.edu/copyright/MOOC
Responses from commercial publishers
To MOOCs / Open Education Initiatives
Harvard: Advocacy & Consulting
- Elsevier embeds textbook content in EdX MOOCs and offers discounts for print / etextbook purchases (2013)
- Coursera launches a 1 year pilot with Cengage, Macmillan, Oxford, Sage, and Wiley to deliver copyrighted content through a DRM protected etextbook reader in exchange for usage data and statistics (2013)
- Nature and Palgrave make data from an Author Insights survey available to the public during Open Access Week (2014)
http://oercuny.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2014/10/07/cuny-oer-online-class/
https://osc.hul.harvard.edu/copyright/first-responders
MOOCs as Microcosm