Outcomes
- Black Death no longer thought to be an unselective, unbiased, virulent scourge
- Additional studies were completed on The Black Death such as femur length and, sex (Male vs. Female) to determine the depth of selectivity
Opinions
- There is a correlation with likelihood of death and skeletal lesions
- If the Black Death was completely unbiased, the -2LLR values would be zero, showing no increased risk
- The specific cause of Black Death was not specified either in this study, thought to be Yersinia pestis
- It was lacking historical data on what the Black Death was
- They overgeneralized the term frailty
References Cited
- Sharon N. EDeWitte., Wood, W James
2008 Selectivity of Black Death Mortality with Respect to Preexisting Health. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(5): 1436-1441.
2010 The Black Death: Natural and Human Disaster in Medieval Europe. Simon and Schuster Inc., New York.
- "The Purpose here was to test whether the Black Death killed people indiscriminately - i.e., regardless of frailty as indicated by the presence of skeletal lesions - or whether Black Death mortality behaved like normal,epidemic mortality in which individuals with the highest frailty were at highest risk of death" (DeWitte and Wood 2008: 1436)
Methods
- A multistate model was used
- Involved using 3 states:
Presence of Lesions, No Lesions and Death
- Used to show distribution of ages and lesion status
- Model is applied separately to the control and sample sites
Selectivity of Black Death with Respect to Preexisting Health
Results
- Data shows that having skeletal lesions during the black death era causes for a decrease in likelihood of mortality
- Graphs show that having skeletal lesions in non-epidemic Denmark had increased likelihood of mortality
- East Smithfield risk of curve greatly resembles regular mortality
Methods
- Paleodemography- age at death
- Age determination using dental eruption and epiphyseal union
- Rostock protocol.
- Dating using hand positions of skeletons
Results
- When comparing likelihood mortality ratio (-2LLR) there is a significant difference between Denmark and East Smithfield
- The proportionality risk of death (K2) is higher in Denmark in comparison to East Smithfield.
- With the exception of Maxilliary Canine LEH and Femur length, data shows more of lower likelihood of mortality as a result of Lesions in East Smithfield
In Conclusion: The Black Death was slightly selective in mortality when compared to prexisting health conditions
Introduction
- Time period - mid 14th Century
- Location- Europe
- East Smithfield - London (established 1348-1349)
- 490 skeletal samples
- St. Albani (Odense) and St. Mikkel Church (Viborg) - Denmark (1100-1500's)
- 291 skeletal samples
Background
- Natural Hazard
- Epidemics
- 30-50% mortality in Europe
- Three Strain
- Septicaemic
- Pneumonic
- Bubonic
- Origins from China by land and sea trade networks
- Spread as a result of poor sanitation
Arguments
- If Black Death killed indiscriminately the people with poor health to begin with should not have been at a higher risk of dying when Black Death hit
Conclusions
By: DeWitte, Sharon N. & James W. Wood
- The Black Death was as slightly selective in mortality, as there is less of a risk of death with skeletal lesions present in East Smithfield
Biases
Presentation By: Brenna Ardiel, Cole Reed and Nerusha Suthaskaran
Discussion and Biases
- Selectivity during the Black Death suggests that those with preexisting diseases increase their risk of death compared to the large population
- However the risk was very minimal
- The study of paleodemography and paleoepidemiology are biased with the death population because the dead can not represent the living population
- This is indicative of one population not all of Europe
- Bias within the Usher model