Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Side #1: Majority Opinion
Side #2 Dissenting Opinion
"Since historically, minors were discriminated against in medical school admissions and in the medical profession, their special admission program could help reverse that. The university also said that the special program increased the number of physicians who practice in underserved communities. Finally, the university reasoned that there are educational benefits to all students when the student body is ethnically and racially diverse. "
"The Superior Court of Yolo County, California agreed with Bakke. It said that the special admissions program violated the federal and state constitutions and was therefore illegal. The Court said that a person's race could not be considered when the University decides whom to admit."
Constitutional Question
Related Cases
Special Admissions Program
16/100 Minority Spots
Unable to prove acceptance
3.49 GPA> 3.46 GPA
"The University of California and Bakke both appealed the case to the Supreme Court of California. This court also declared the special admissions policy unconstitutional and said that Bakke had to be admitted to the medical school. The Regents of the University of California then appealed the case to the Supreme Court of the United States."
Special Admissions Program
21 African American
30 Mexican
12 Asian
total: 63 "minority" students
Regular Admissions Program
1 African American
6 Mexican
37 Asian
total: 44 "minority" students
* no disadvantaged white candidates were admitted
Note: The term "minority" was a racial classification used by UC Davis at the time
Our Position