Conclusion
despite the positive attributes of ractopamine usage, serious changes are necessary to sustain the U.S.'s international trade and agricultural reputation
Possible Solutions/recommendations
Our Stance
Refer back to the pros and cons
- make the drug accessible to producers only after recommendation by veternarians
- place further limitations on the continued implementation of Ractopamine
- conduct further studies to better determine the long term ramifications of ractopamine on livestock and humans
- extra growth achieved as a result of Ractopamine use puts more money in producers' pockets and increases global meat supply
- negative health effects and global trade implications could seriously cripple the U.S. agricultural industry if not addressed.
Reasons for Current Situation
Describe the current situation
- Incomplete/dishonest research reports downplayed side effects of ractopamine use in market animals
- lack of long-term research coupled with current federal standards allowed for initial approval
Federal Standards
- currently, Ractopamine is sold over-the-counter to farmers and ranchers
- in recent years, there have been increased reports of animal and human health issues linked to ractopamine use
Health Concerns
- loose federal standards resulted in loopholes which Elanco easily navigated
- no long term studies required prior to approval for over-the-counter distribution
- no veternarian approval needed for purchase of product
Dishonesty
- no veterinary approval or recommendation is needed to purchase the drug
- increased reports of animal health problems such as lameness, downer pigs, and death
- cardiovascular problems and poisoning in humans linked to ractopamine
Foreign Relations
- Elanco was responsible for conducting its own research prior to FDA approval
- hid some research from FDA officials that would have resulted in negative implications
Incomplete Research
- currently banned by the majority of countries
- increasingly limited export markets as a result of ractopamine (Paylean) utilization
- threat of an imminent trade war
Economics
- no long term studies were conducted to observe potential effects on the human population
- no long term studies conducted to observe long term residue found within the meat
- as a result of strained trade relations, fewer importers means less money for U.S. producers
- exacerbates the current economic climate and downturn
- economic stalemate
International Controversy
- important international considerations
- economic ramifications
- foreign relations
- export markets
Pro
Con
- for export to countries with no ban in place, increased growth results in increased profits for U.S. agriculture
- economic gains stimulate the economy as ractopamine accounts for over $1 billion in increased yields annually
- majority of countries ban ractopamine use or purchase of animals containing ractopamine residue
- European Union and China consume 70% of pork produced in U.S.- ractopamine is banned by all countries in the E.U. and China
- economic and trade disadvantage
Musculoskeletal Effects
- sustained growth prior to slaughter
- most common side effect is muscular tremors
- downer pigs
- lame animals
Pro
Con
- increased growth prior to slaughter
- increases economic bottom line for producers
- increase in the amount of meat produced with fewer animals
- lame animals or downer pigs negatively effect the food supply
- animal health/cruelty charges
- bottom line negatively effected
- negative response from consumers, non-agriculturalists and international lobbyists
Cardiovascular Effects
- linked to cardiovascular side effects in both animals and humans
- increased heart rate and blood pressure within the first hour following dosage
Pro
Con
- increased blood flow and circulation
- returns to baseline levels fairly quickly
- not a chronic issue
- can result in death, especially within the swine industry
- resulting from a combination of PSS and increased heart rate
- resulting deaths significantly effect the economic bottom linen for producers and U.S. trade
What if we do nothing?
- consider economic results both in the short and long terms
- consider the possible effect on foreign relations and global trade
Pro
Con
- livestock producers continue to increase annual profits
- agricultural lobbyists are successful in promoting the U.S. agricultural industry
- increased animal growth results in more meat production
- potential international trade war
- possible economic downturn as a result of bans in foreign markets
- producers lose money
- continued decline in animal health
What is Ractopamine??
- a controversial, over-the-counter, beta agonist feed additive fed to cattle, pigs, and turkeys prior to slaughter to promote animal growth.
- marketed under the name Paylean for pigs
- marketed under the name Optaflexx for cattle
recommendation
current dilemmas
Explain your goals
- modified requirements for the distribution of ractopamine
- further studies to monitor potential effects on animals and humans
- revised standards of acceptability for use of ractopamine based on more up to date and accurate studies
- educate the general public in regards to common drugs utilized within the food supply
- explore the positive and negative ramifications of ractopamine use in cattle, swine, and poultry
- government agencies favor continued ractopamine use despite growing concerns
- increasingly negative feedback and action from global trade entities
- animal health and animal cruelty concerns
Ractopamine
Based on Jim Harvey's speech structures