Loading…
Transcript

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

- Assessment for Learning pertains to the use of formative evaluation to determine and improve students’ learning Outcomes.

- Teaching and learning plans are based on the results of formative assessment which provides feedback the effectiveness of teaching and learning process as seen from the students learning.

Formative assessment occurs at three (3) points of instruction:

(1) during instruction;

(2) between lessons; and

(3) between units.

(William & Leahy, 2007).

SUMMATIVE

ASSESSMENT

- Assessment of Learning uses summative evaluation which provides evidence of students’ level of achievement in relation to curricular learning Outcomes.

- Summative assessment on the other hand, is used to determine how much students have learned at the end of term, unit or academic year. Summative assessment is one basis for determining the final grade as demonstrated from the achievement of the students.

NORM-REFERENCED ASSESSMENT

Gives us information on what the student can perform by comparing to another student. It describes student performance in the class by comparing to others.

CRITERION-REFERENCED ASSESSMENT

CONTEXTUALIZED ASSESSMENT

DECONTEXTUALIZED ASSESSMENT

ANALYTIC

ASSESSMENT

refers to specific approach in

the assessment of learning outcomes.

HOLISTIC

ASSESSMENT

Prsented By:

Canindo, Jyrish

Solomon, Rhecylin

Includes written exams and term papers, which are suitable for assessing declarative knowledge, and do not necessary have direct connection to a real-life context.

 It describes assessment practices which measures skills and knowledge in dealing with situations or perform specific tasks which the students identified as important and meaningful to them.

 It was performanced-based tasks which authentic in nature.

The focus is on the student construction of function knowledge and the students' performance in application of knowledge in the real way context of the discipline area.

 It focuses on declarative knowledge and procedural knowledge in artificial situations detached from the real work context .

Describes the performance of the students without reference to the performance of others which uses preset criteria or predefined and absolute standard or outcomes.

 Usually, it describes student's mastery of the course content, thus there is no competition for a limited percentage for a high score.

 Teachers can actually rank the achievement of their students; as a result, there is a limited percentage of competition for those who are high scorers.

Overview

Intended Learning Outcome :

At the end of the chapter, you should be able to distinguish the different types of assessment, and relate it to learning outcomes.

- Assessment is an essential and powerful tool in the teaching and learning process.

- it is a process of obtaining data with which we could measure student competence and learning outcomes.

TYPES

OF

TRADITIONAL ASSESSMENT

AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT

- This kind of assessment is standardized and for speed-based, and norm-referenced (Bailey, 1998).

Paper-and-pencil tests or quizzes

TRADITIONAL ASSESSMENT

Traditional assessments are indirect and inauthentic outcomes.

Focus on learner’s ability of memorization and recall, (Smaldino, 2000).

2. Authentic assessments capture constructive nature of learning.

In a constructivist point of view, learners should create knowledge and meaningful based from schemata. Thus, assessments cannot just ask students to repeat information they have received. Students must also be asked to demonstrate that they have accurately constructed meaning about what they have been taught. Moreover students must be given the opportunity to engage in the construction of meaningful Authentic tasks not only see as assessments but also as vehicles for such learning

A. The Context of the Assessment

- Realistic activity or Context

- The task is performance based

- The task is cognitively complex

B.The Role of the Student

- A defense of the answer or product is required.

- The assessment is formative.

- Students collaborate with each other or with the teacher.

C.The Scoring

- The scoring criteria are known or student-developed.

- Multiple indicators or portfolios are used for scoring.

- The performance expectation is mastery.

The commonly reported dimension of authenticity are gropued into three broad categories (Frey, 2012)

3. Authentic assessments integrate teaching, learning, and assessment.

Problem solving and decision making skills are best exemplified by this, purpose. Students are learning the process of developing a solution to a problem by simply applying the meaningful concepts

4. Authentic assessments provide multiple paths to demonstration.

authentic tasks tend to give the students more freedom on how they will demonstrate what they have learned.

1. Authentic assessments are direct measures.

This could be done also by teachers by asking the students to use what they have learned in some meaningful way. (e.g. Conducting a science experiment - hypothesis testing, developing feasibility study, calculating savings).

AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT

2. Authentic assessments capture constructive nature of learning.

In a constructivist point of view, learners should create knowledge and meaningful based from schemata. Thus, assessments cannot just ask students to repeat information they have received. Students must also be asked to demonstrate that they have accurately constructed meaning about what they have been taught. Moreover students must be given the opportunity to engage in the construction of meaningful Authentic tasks not only see as assessments but also as vehicles for such learning

1. The task should be representative of performance in the field.

2. Attention should be paid to teaching and learning the criteria for assessment.

3. Self-assessment should play a great role.

4. When possible, students’ should present their work publicly and defend it.

Four basic characteristics of Authentic Assessment

Some of the best uses

of authentic assessment

- focuses on the analytical and creative thinking skills, students to work cooperatively and that reflect student learning, student achievement and student attitudes of relevant activities.

1. Authentic assessments are direct measures.

This could be done also by teachers by asking the students to use what they have learned in some meaningful way. (e.g. Conducting a science experiment - hypothesis testing, developing feasibility study, calculating savings).

Summative assessment

-Conducted at the end of each section or unit to find out student achievementE.g. tests, exams, essays, or projects that form a portion of a student’s final grade.07).

 The application of the various assessment methods needs to tailored in a way that it will enhance a student's personal strength..

Assessment then is made specific based on the importance of the performance. With this, assessment shouldn't be undertaken in part must address the whole performance,

 In holistic assessment the teacher or the assessment has to develop complex mental responses to a student's work and in evaluating the students work, the assessor provides a grade and supports it with a valid justification for assigned the grade

  The correct application of holistic assessment in the various areas study is expected to improve the student's learning outcome.

 Holistic assessment could be in the form of reflection papers and journals, pre-assessment, self-assessment, group presentation and portfolio.

refers to a global approach in the assessment of a student-learning outcome.

 In this procedure, students are given feedback on how well they doing on each important aspect of specific task expected from them.