Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Vincent THOMAS

Charlene ROLLAND

Adrien TILHET PRAT

Procter & Gamble welcoming Gillette

Vulnerabilities of P&G Integration Planning

Difficulties in communication: differences in interpretation

Strong commitment of P&G towards Gilette which led to anxiety among P&G employees

Cultural differences

Hard adaptation for both P&G and Gilette employees

P&G employees were feeling left aside

A huge merger

Social integration mechanisms

Emphasis on Gilette’s know-how

Gilette alliance with P&G was essential to create « the best consumer company in the world »

Clean & transition planning teams

Create new teams by integrating Gilette’s employees to P&G teams

Were they successful? Did Gillette trust P&G?

«  There was excitement  »

“we are joining a tremendous partner to create the best consumer products company in the world”

BUT

Gillette employee still wondered How would P&G integrate Gilette’s businesses into P&G’s business units

What were the operational integration mechanisms?

How did Lafley build trust with Kilts?

What should change, remain the same or be added after the change of control?

What sequence of actions did he take to initiate systematic change?

A.G Lafley: CEO of Procter & Gamble

Jim Kilts: CEO of Gilette

“The P&G culture is more collaborative, open, and competitive than you may know it to be”

“They are not necessary”

COLABORATIVE NEGOCIATION

RAJA GUPTA

How did P&G managers try to do the same with members of Gillette Organization?

Integration tools and mechanisms

Lafley wanted to use Gillette to create the "best consumer products company in the world".

Create a joint Global Integration STEERING COMMITTEE

Clear explaination of the cultures and values of P&G and Gilette

Creation of a new culture?

Continue to integrate Gilette manager into P&G teams

Create team synergies (eg. Renault & Nissan merger)

P&G PROMISED TO DELIVER $1.0 TO $1.2 BILLION in cost synergies by year three

THEY WILL CUT JOBS FROM THE TWO COMPANIES : 5,000 to 6,000 of the total 140,000 jobs

They also committed to OBTAINING $750 MILLION IN REVENUE SYNERGIES by year three

They Called it a merger not an acquisition

Human resources and integration

  • Communication
  • Building and Sustaining Trust
  • Training Program
  • Career Planning
  • Counseling

Conclusion and Recommendation

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi