"Sentence and sub-sentence
phenomena"
An 31-year-old man, whose name is unknown, robbed the bank.
-vs-
About half a million pesos was...
Thank you!
References:
The University of North Carolina College of Arts and Sciences Writing Center. The Passive Voice. 2010. November 2013 <http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/passive-voice/>.
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. Grammar and Its Teaching: Challenging the Myths. March 1997. November 2013 <http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/larsen01.html>.
—. Teaching Grammar: In teaching English as a second or foreign language. Singapore: Heinle&Heinle-Thomson Learning, 2006.
Larsen-Freeman, Marianne Celce-Murcia and Diane. The grammar book. Singapore: Heinle-Thomson Learning Asia, 2008.
Orwell, George. "Politics and the English Language." 1946.
The three-dimensional grammar
framework
Conclusions
- The multi-dimensional approach to grammar is a more progressive conceptual framework compared with the traditional single-level framework that focuses on form/structures only.
- However, many grammar teachers and students adhere to the single-level framework (or may not even be aware of the multi-dimensional approach!).
Hence, it will be timely to recalibrate the pedagogical styles so that non-native learners of the language can use English appropriately given the context.
Learning objectives:
1. To describe the three dimensional
grammar framework as defined by Larsen-
Freeman
2. To distinguish between the three dimensional framework and the traditional view
3. To construct a multi-dimensional approach to grammar structures
Illustration
Formalism/structuralism
How was it formed?
Functionalism
- Verb+particle
- Verb+particle+preposition
- Can be transitive or intransitive
- For many of them, the particle can be separated from the verb
Can be literal ("hang up") or figurative ("stumble upon"
Can have multiple meanings ("came across")
What does it mean?
But viewing language as an
absolute dichotomy would be
an "oversimplification." (Schiffrin, 1994)
Informal versus formal English
"Put off" vs "Postpone"
"Went on" vs "Continued"
When and why is it used?
Three dimensional
grammar framework
Myths
Class activity (Now let's try it!)
These ideas reflect a shallow and traditional framework by which many people, teachers included, understand grammar.
Semantics
Lexical meaning or
grammatical meaning
Let us ask ourselves first. What
comes to mind when we hear the
word "grammar"?
Structure
Morphosyntactic and lexical patterns
Morphology + Syntax
- verb to be (is, are, am, among others) + past participle form
- In terms of basic sentence pattern:
- S-TV-DO --->S-LV-C
- Passive form tenses
- Ex. She was taken to the hospital (by her parents)
- The subject is the "receiver" of the action
- In converting active to passive voice, the direct object becomes the subject
Pragmatics
Context-appropriate use
Context can be social or linguistic
Arbitrary (Why? Because it is.)
- When the object is more important than the doer of the action (i.e. exceptions in journalism)
- When the readers do not need to know who the doer of the action is
- Lack of clarity/precision in using the passive voice ("lazy writing")
- In scientific reports (the tone of objectivity). The trend now, however, is to stop relying on the passive voice
- "Swindles and perversions" in writing, as George Orwell described them
Some notes:
1. Notice that the dimensions are
wedges of the same pie. Therefore, they are not
hierarchically arranged, unlike in the traditional framework.
2. A change in one dimension involves a change in the other.
Baby Regina was delivered at 2:30 a.m.
yesterday
-vs-
Dr. Eroles delivered Baby Regina at 2.30
a.m. yesterday
The solution was desaturated by adding
50 ml H2O.
-vs-
We desaturated the solution by adding 50
ml H2O.
"Mistakes were made."
The new UP student code of conduct was criticized.