The Peaceful Transition of Power from the UK to the US through the
Constructivism Theory
CONCLUSION
Shift in power is a shift in identities.
Benign interaction - Construction of identities
Type of association which had never existed
before
A. E. Campbell, “Great Britain and the United States:” 1895–1903
(London: Longman, 1960), p.124.
A.F.K. Organski, World Politics, 2nd Edition (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. 1968),
pp. 363–77.
Aaron Friedberg, “The Weary Titan: Britain and the Experience of Relative Decline”,
1895–1905 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988), p.168
Alexander Wendt, “Social Theory of International Politics” (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1999), p.224.
B.R. Schlenker and M.F. Weigold, “Goals and the Self-identification Process:
Constructing Desired Identity, in Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology”
(Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1989), p.245.
Bradford Perkins, “The Great Rapprochement: England and the United States”, 1895–
1914, (New York: Atheneum, 1968), p.165.
Charles S. Champbell, Jr., “The Transformation of American Foreign Relations”, 1865–
1900 (New York, 1968), p.213, inferred from Yang Shengmao, ed., History of
American Diplomatic Policy, p.198.
Christopher Layne, “Kant of Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace”, International
Security, Vol. 19, No. 2 (Fall 1994).
E.H. Erikeson, Identity, Youth and Crisis (New York: Norton, 1968), p.17.
Edward H. Carr, “The Twenty Years Crisis, 1919–1939 “(New York: Harper and Row,
1964), pp. 208–23.
George Modelski “Long Cycles in World Politics’’ (MacMillan, 1987)
Joseph Nye, “Understanding International Conflicts”, p.97
Kenneth Bourne, “The Balance of Power in North America”, 1815–1908 (Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1967), pp. 340–1
Michael Doyle, “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs”, Part I, Philosophy and
Public Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Summer 1983), pp. 205–35
Michael Doyle, “Liberalism and World Politics,” American Political Science Review,
Vol. 80, No. 4 (1986), pp. 1151–69
Paul Kennedy, “The Realities Behind Diplomacy: Background Influences on British
External Policy,1865–1980 (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1981), pp.107–9
Paul M. Kennedy, “The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and
Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000” (New York: Random House, 1987).
Peter Berger, “Identity as a problem in the Sociology of Knowledge,” European Journal
of Sociology, Vol. 7, No. 1 (1996), p.111, inferred from Alexander Wendt,
“Anarchy is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics,”
International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2 (1992), pp. 397–8.
R.G. Neale, “Great Britain and United States Expansion”:1898–1900 (East Lansing, MI:
Michigan State University Press, 1966)
Robert Mowat, “The Diplomatic Relations of Great Britain and the United States”
(London: 1925), p.206, inferred from Yang Shengmao, ed., History of
American Diplomatic Policy, p.172.
Stephen R. Rock, “Why Peace Breaks Out: Great Power Rapprochement in Historical
Perspective” (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989), pp. 35–7.
Rising challenger - declining champion
The world's largest economy
NO to war of supremacy
Power transfer and constructivism theory
Constructivism
"International politics is shaped by persuasive ideas, collective
values, culture, and social identities."
International reality is socially constructed
CONSTRUCTIVISM VS OTHER THEORIES
Constructivism
Realism theory
Liberalism theory
‘democratic peace theory’
‘balance of threats’
‘balance of power’
‘identity’ ‘interaction ’ ‘structure/culture ’
Power Transition Theory
Overtaking at the top of international system
Willingness
Power transition peace
SPECIAL RELATIONS
Winston Churchill '' Iron Curtain '' speech
Obstacle course
Dominant international system.
Professor: Syuzanna Vasilyan
Student: Ani Mkhoyan
INTRODUCTION
POWER TRANSITION THEORY
SPECIAL RELATIONS
CONSTRUCTIVISM VS OTHER THEORIES
CONCLUSION
design by Dóri Sirály for Prezi