만나보세요 

Prezi AI.

새로운 프레젠테이션 도우미가 기다리고 있어요.

뎌욱 빠르게 컨텐츠를 다듬고, 보강하고, 편집하고, 원하는 이미지를 찾고, 시각자료를 편집하세요.

로딩중
스크립트

Reno v. ACLU

  • Reno v. ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)
  • the CDA violated both the first and fifth amendment.
  • the Act criminalized the intentional transmission of "obscene or indecent" messages
  • 1997

the first and fifth amendments are being violated.

the ACLU argued that children should not be subject to indecent material of any kind on the internet so there should be no indecent material on the internet.

Attorney General Reno appealed the case due to the unconstitutional content of the case (freedom of speech and expression)

  • the court decided that the Act violated the first amendment because it restricted freedom of speech.
  • the Act could be saved if the words "or indecent" were taken out of its text
  • the court refused to address the fifth amendment issue.
  • now there is more restriction on the internet but it still needs work.
  • children can still get access to an "adult" web site
  • there are restrictions on certain types of web sites

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reno_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union

www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_96_511/

Constitutional Issue

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/96-511.ZS.html

Info.

Constitutional POV

1997

by Amanda Johnson

Impact on the Country

Unconstitutional POV

Supreme Court Decision

프레지로 더욱 인상깊고 역동적인 프레젠테이션을 만들어 보세요