Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health

By: Tiffany and Tricia

Monday, June 25, 1990

Vol XCIII, No. 311

The Court Case

Positions on the case

The Incident

The lawyers that were against Cruzan didnt believe that they had any right for the life support plug to be pulled. On the otherhand,

lawyers on Cruzan's side believed that there should be a worthy regulation or official document

that states when treatment may be refused.

About the Case

It was discussed that if it was in violation of the 14th

amendment, the right to refuse medical treatment,

the parents of Nancy Cruzan could refuse treatment

for their daughter due to her unresponsive and

vegetative state.

The decision was a 4-5 vote that ruled an

incompetent person is not able to exercise the right

to refuse treatment.

The Importance/Impact of the Court's Decision on U.S. Society

In 1983 Nancy Beth Cruzan was in an automobile accident which left her in an unresponsive, vegetative state. They said her parents believed that she should be taken off life support due to

her condition.

Althought the treatment could not be

refused, there was still an outcome

that later impacted the lives of others.

A document was created that a person could fill out and sign to determine when their medical treatment may be ceased once they reach a certain point of condition.

"Did the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment permit Cruzan's parents to refuse life-sustaining treatment on their daughters behalf?"

www.phschool.com/curriculum_support/interactive_constitution/scc/scc08.htm

http://web.utk.edu/~scheb/decisions/cruzan.html

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/497/261

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi