Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Woodcock Johnson Test of Achievement

Outline

General Information

  • Woodcock Johnson Test of Achievement 3rd Edition
  • Riverside Publishing
  • Authors: Richard Woodcock Ph.D., Nancy Mather Ph.D. and Kevin S. McGrew Ph.D.
  • Battery of 10-42 subtests, 5-10 min each
  • $444.00 for WJ III ACH Battery
  • Test measures both cognitive ability and academic achievement
  • General Information
  • Purpose and Nature of Test
  • Practical Evaluation
  • Normative data
  • Reliability
  • Validity
  • Reviewer comments
  • Summary
  • References

Normative Data

Revision History

  • Test cannot be scored by hand, score is a product of normative analysis.
  • Provides deficiency data for further testing
  • Co-normative between WJ III COG and ACH
  • Normative data for grades K-Grad
  • Normative data for ages 2-90+

Normative Data

  • Norms grouped by grade, minimum n = 198 (graduate student) maximum n=582 (4th grade)
  • Population size: 5,948
  • Further grouped by decade (i.e. 20-29, 30-29, etc.) minimum n=147 (80+) maximum n=1,011 (20-29)
  • Population size: 8,818
  • Randomized 10 community and 13 socio-economic variables
  • Uses continuous-year norms

Reliability

Subtests

Normative Data

  • Test-retest reliability for the achievement subtests in the battery vary from 0.69 to 0.96 with an average reliability of 0.83 and a median of 0.88
  • Inter-rater reliability scores largely not applicable, average reliability of 0.81 for those which it is.
  • Benefit to co-norming two tests: discrepancy scores
  • Percentile rank
  • SD discrepancy
  • Intra-Ability discrepancy
  • Intra-Individual
  • Intra-Cognitive
  • Intra-Achievement
  • Ability/Achievement Discrepancy
  • Predicted/actual achievement
  • Intellectual/achievement
  • Oral language ability/achievement
  • WJ-R (1989)
  • Integrated Gf-Gc Theory
  • Larger normative sample
  • Item revisions
  • WJ III (2001)
  • Increased use of Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory
  • Addition of 7 subtests
  • 5 broad categories added to WJ III COG
  • WJ III COG divided into verbal/thinking ability and cognitive efficiency
  • Normative update to WJ III (2007)

Validity

Reliability

  • Face validity - W scores correlated to known developmental patterns.
  • Construct validity - Confirmatory factor analytic models conforming to the ability strata defined by CHC theory
  • Construct validity - Moderate inter-correlation between unrelated clusters (0.5-0.7)
  • Alternate forms reliability was determined via 100-400 item banks arranged on a difficulty gradient.
  • Forms A and B correlate between 0.85 and 0.96 for various age groups.

Validity

  • Concurrent Validity - General and Brief Intellectual ability scores of the WJ III COG correlate with Wechsler at ~0.7
  • Concurrent Validity - WJ III ACH correlates at 0.78 with Wechsler Individual achievement test.

Reviewer Comments

  • "Substantive Evidence....Broad and narrow abilities are measured" (Shrank, 2001)
  • "Good concurrent validity overall" (Shrank, 2001)
  • "Reliabilities are sufficiently high, almost all in the .90’s" (Shrank, 2001)

Purpose and Nature of Test

  • 20 tests of cognitive ability, 22 tests of achievement
  • Verbal/thinking ability, cognitive efficiency
  • Reading (5 tests) Oral Language (4 tests) Math (4 tests) Written Language (4 tests) Knowledge (1 test) Supplemental (4* tests)
  • Standard Battery (12 tests)
  • Extended Battery (22 tests)
  • Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery 1977
  • Authored by Richard Woodcock Ph.D. and Mary Bonner Johnson
  • First of it's kind: IQ/Achievement battery
  • Became diagnostic criteria of learning disabilities
  • Ages 2-90+

Summary

  • The WJ III Test of achievment displays superior strengths in measuring the total cognitive profile of an individual
  • Co-normative data allows valid inferences to be made within a single test
  • Test could do a better job representing ethnic and socio-economic minorities.

References

  • Flanagan, D. (2001). Comparative Features of the WJ III Tests of Cognitive Abilities (Woodcock-Johnson III: Assessment Service Bulletin No. 1) Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
  • McGrew, K.S., Werder, J.K., & Woodcock, R.W. (1991). WJ-R Technical Manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
  • Plake, B., Impara, J., & Spies, R. (2003). Fifteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Technical Abstract (Woodcock-Johnson III Assessment Service Bulletin No.2). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
  • Woodcock, RW, McGrew, KS, & Mather N (2001) WJ OOO Otasca, IL: Riverside publishing

Practical Evaluation

  • Scoring
  • Comparison to normative data for grade
  • Standard Score
  • Percentile Rank
  • W score
  • Analyzes 5 Broad CHC Factors:
  • Reading-Writing (i.e. reading/writing fluency)
  • Mathematics (i.e. calculation)
  • Comprehension-knowledge (i.e. Story recall)
  • Auditory processing (i.e. sound spelling)
  • Long-term retrieval (delayed recall)
Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi