Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Why did Japan become a Militaristic and Imperial State?

Reasons for Imperial expansion

  • Uniting Asian provinces 'their Asian destiny'
  • Security
  • Resources for fueling industrial growth
  • Becoming an International power
  • Competing with European power in Asia

Imperial Expansion

  • Authoritarian Governors that were given both legislative and executive powers
  • Before 1910 there been no colonial office to deal with overseas territories
  • difficulty with territories led to greater influence of the military on the governorship
  • 'faithful Japanese followers, not able Japanese Leaders'
  • Colonial subjects were only seen as part of the lower levels of the social order

Conclusion

  • Ideas of nationalism were widespread throughout political spectrum
  • Strong popular support from the military
  • Nationalism led to support of the military
  • military power led to widespread acceptance of imperialist ambitions

Left wing (liberals)

Government and military relations

Inter-War Japan

  • Siniawer argues that nationalism of liberal thinkers was key in forming a militaristic state
  • Militarism occurred against a backdrop of increasing violence from right-wing nationalist groups
  • 'Complicity' from government that did not intervene
  • Number of territorial dependencies prerequisite for Imperial expansion
  • Inter-war boom led to increased desire for raw materials
  • Imperial desire fed by right wing political groups as well as military figures
  • Mainly disparate intellectuals, some organisation present however
  • Denounced state's tolerance of violence as early as 1923
  • Condemned violent right wing as tyrannical
  • Believed the state's first duty was to preserve order, as such held nationalist tendencies
  • Encouraged control by state, or at least ambivalent to power
  • Failed to form truly organised response to right wing groups
  • Communist party joined nationalists in 1933
  • Increasing divergence between Military leadership and civilian government
  • Armed Forces had theoretical potential to bring down cabinets through resignations
  • Hanneman:
  • 'growing weakness of the civillian government vis-a-vis the military'
  • Exception with PM Tanaka (1927-29) who supported military action in China
  • PM Hamaguchi gunned down November 1930 by right wing activist supporting the military

Emergence of Nationalism embracing the State

  • Left and right included in supporting state embracing nationalism
  • "the 'love of society' that was the foundation of liberal states was rejected in totalitarian ethnic nations like Japan in favor of 'love of the fatherland' - Doak on Shirayangi
  • state could be supported by nationalism
  • totalitarianism accepted due to racial unity of state and nation
  • ethno-nationalism not civil society basis of the state
  • "No longer an agent for oppressing the common people, the state has become the people's natural protector and advocate" - Doak

The right wing

Positive liberalism and nationalism

Ethno-Nationalism

  • Formed into violent nationalist groups in 1920s
  • Labeled Boryokudan (violence groups) by liberal thinkers
  • Violently subdued labour strikes
  • Most criticised by liberal thinkers was Dai Nihon Kokusuikai, which had 200,000 members at peak and 90 branches
  • Claimed violence was an expression of loyalty to Emperor
  • Kokusuikai seen as harbingers of violent, ideological strife by liberals
  • Supported the military's power and government control
  • Belief in freedom to rather than freedom from
  • Susceptible to totalitarianism
  • Akami
  • "liberals gave more emphasis to political participation thanindividual freedom for the state"
  • Tomoko
  • "the fundamental dilemma of liberalism in the age of mass-based democracy: how far the state could intervene against individual liberty for the sake of the welfare of the society as a whole"
  • Berlin believed that individualism gave way to perception of 'true self' being part of a 'social 'whole''. Ideally suited to nationalism
  • Initial challenge to state authority
  • Conflict between modernisation and Japanese identity
  • Kohn - "nationalism is first and foremost a state of mind"
  • Tension between ethnic nation and state
  • widespread sense government was not representative of the nation
  • Fukuzawa
  • "In Japan there is a government but no nation"
Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi