Introducing 

Prezi AI.

Your new presentation assistant.

Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.

Loading…
Transcript

Step 2

Best evidence research and synthesis

  • Literature Review
  • Qualitative data

  • Quantitative data

  • Clinical practice guidelines

Step 4

Design

STUDENTS

CURRICULA

  • Retention

  • Active Participation

  • Graduation requirements

  • Progression in the program
  • Role preparation
  • Evidenced-based
  • Student-centered
  • Concept-based
  • Competencies

Step 3

Feasibility, Benefits, and Risks

LEARNING

  • Evidence-based Change

  • Implementation of the change

  • Gather stakeholder feedback

  • Pilot the change

  • Gather formative data

  • Gather NCLEX-RN pass rates results

RESOURCES

FACULTY

  • Physical resources

  • Monetary resources

  • Human Resources

Researcher

Clinician

Expertise

Step 1

Step 5

Program Evaluation

Evaluation of curriculum change

Assess the need for change

  • Validity of data

  • Efficacy of data

  • Desired outcomes if a change is implemented

  • Implementation of change

  • Re-evaluation of change

Problem:

There is a noticeable knowledge gap between the didactic course

work and student self efficacy in the clinical setting.

Purpose:

Improve student's feelings of self efficacy In the clinical setting by bridging critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills.

Goals

Outcomes

  • Introduce an intermediate medical surgical course to the curriculum

  • Increases self efficacy

  • Increases competence in the clinical setting

  • Obtain objective information on the benefits of adding a class

  • Obtain formative proof by increasing NCLEX_RN pass rates

Introduction

Step 6

Maintenance & MSN Role

Shana Miller RN,BSN

CNA: LTCF, Neuro 10 years

LPN: LTCF 1 year

RN, BSN: LTCF, Med/Surg, Neuro, Tele, Ortho, ER, GI, Step down, Home care, CNA instructor, BLS instructor, and Nursing faculty

Clinical Excellence

In promoting maintenance of a curriculum change the Nurse Educator's responsibility is:

  • Research
  • Development
  • National standards followed
  • Best practices included
  • Stakeholder feedback evaluated and implemented
  • Gathering results from all testing procedures

Clinical practice guidelines for

curriculum revision

Nurse Educators Role:

  • Program evaluation

  • Include stakeholder feedback

  • Include National standards

  • Pilot the change

Summary & Conclusion

Barriers to Change

Abstract

References:

  • Resistance from faculty members

  • Time frame increased

  • Monetary involvement increased

  • Not persuasive for stakeholder buy in

  • SBON involvement

Evidenced-based nursing practice as it pertains to designing curriculum is a role that demands the knowledge of an advanced practice nurse.

Practicing as a nurse educator requires incorporating a multidisciplinary view that assists in following all National and State requirements.

Thank you for your attention, I may be reached at shanamiller85@gmail.com for a copy of this presentation.

Are there any questions?

Davis, B.W. (2011). A conceptual model to support curriculum review, revision, and design in an associate degree nursing program. Nursing Education Perspectives 32(6) 389-394.

Institute of Medicine (2010). The future of nursing leading change, advancing health: Report recommendations. Retrieved from http;//www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2010/The-Future-of- nursing/Future%20of%20Nursing%202010%20

Larrabee, J. (2009). Nurse to nurse: Evidence-based practice, expert interventions. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

National League for Nursing (2005). Core competencies of nurse educators with task statements. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/profdev/corecompetencies.pdf

National League for Nurses (2012). Retrieved from http://nln.org/aboutnln/ourmission.htm

Schug, V. (2012). Curriculum evaluation using National League for Nursing Accrediting

Commission standards and criteria. Nursing Education Perspectives 33(5), 302-305.

Curriculum design in an accelerated nursing program is driven by many factors.Pass rates, new technology, student populations,and the necessity of keeping current with national trends are the factors that drive a revision. While there is no standardized way to revise curriculum there are nurse educator standards that were created by the National League of Nursing (NLN)to guide educators toward meeting the recommended goals in education (NLN, 2008).Content saturation in nursing programs has long been a concern. In order to be compliant with suggestions from the Institute of Medicine, educators have moved from a teacher-centered environment to a student-centered environment(Davis,2011).

Curriculum Design in an Accelerated Associates Degree Program

Shana Miller RN, BSN, MSN/ED

Learn more about creating dynamic, engaging presentations with Prezi