EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PRESENTATION
Transcript: GROUP STRUCTURE KEY PROCESSES Should be: flexible and mutually respected Your group did well: status flexibility Could be improved: assigning status roles based upon assumptions Should be: respectful yet communicative, engaged in group process Your group did well: no rude responses to input, members remained focused, involved Could be improved: eye contact/focus on each member when speaking, eliminate distractions, creating complete understandings of ideas Agenda Should be: reached by consensus, diversity of options, everyone heard Your group did well: made decisions quickly, minimal conflict, time spent Could be improved: certain members looked to for approval, accomodating, minimal ideas offered Brainstorming Process: Decision Making Forming Management of Differing Opinions Setting an Agenda: Should be: clear, established early, group understanding Your group did well: involved, task-oriented Could be improved: specifics of goal, establishing the goal from the beginning Should be: a method to tie members to the group (goal and attraction, cooprtative) Your group did well: social interactions, driven towards goal, mutual desire to succeed Could be improved: cohesion amongst entire group, feeling of comfort Status Relations devote more time allowing each member to present ideas creating a comfortable environment in which members feel that they can contribute Definition of group success Success in your group Opportunities for improvement RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GROUP IMPROVEMENT Interactive Activity TEAM NEMO Cohesion Roles Should be: negotiate conflict, integrative Your group did well: supportive of contributions, respectful Could be improved: favoring one opinion based on status, suggestions are acknowledged Should be: (in small groups) decentralized, inclusive Your group did well: centralized leadership-efficiency Could be improved: more decentralized style of leadership, higher level of input from all members Should be: high role fit Your group did well: respected leader, mutual trust, centralized but not dictatorial Could be improved: distinction of roles, equally valued roles discuss goals, roles, and processes agenda high efficiency eliminate confusion/lack of direction throughout process STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT Goals Communication Structure Group structure Key processes Stage of group development Reccomendations Communication Skills