Audio Transcript Auto-generated
- 00:02 - 00:04
So hi everyone and welcome to my presentation.
- 00:04 - 00:06
My presentation and my monsters are focused on
- 00:06 - 00:09
our mobility and safety and ability innovations.
- 00:09 - 00:11
So let's get started.
- 00:11 - 00:14
So safe and building innovations are increasingly
- 00:14 - 00:17
implemented to create a safer traffic environment.
- 00:17 - 00:19
As you can see this is highly needed.
- 00:19 - 00:24
Most accidents are caused by ice feedings and distractions.
- 00:24 - 00:26
These innovations can help prevent these accidents.
- 00:26 - 00:30
However, there are some challenges that these innovations have to overcome.
- 00:30 - 00:32
one of them is to increase
- 00:34 - 00:36
um support from the wider public.
- 00:37 - 00:40
Now the safety multi innovations can be assessed from different perceptions
- 00:40 - 00:43
and they usually assessed by valuing safety
- 00:43 - 00:45
and travel time to the consumer perspective.
- 00:45 - 00:47
Um so when a certain ability information is
- 00:47 - 00:50
not aligned with the self interests and believe structured
- 00:50 - 00:52
ritual, it will be rejected.
- 00:53 - 00:58
Innovation can also be successful and citizen perspective, this is rarely done.
- 00:58 - 01:03
This means that innovation is or like they will be assessed more focused on the
- 01:03 - 01:06
collective benefits and the costs are not paid
- 01:06 - 01:08
that individual but paid by the government.
- 01:09 - 01:13
Um The state's ability to patients are focused on the collective interest.
- 01:13 - 01:15
So this means that if you look at
- 01:15 - 01:18
the difference between the consumer excessive perspective,
- 01:18 - 01:19
there will be a difference.
- 01:19 - 01:20
Um
- 01:22 - 01:25
So yeah, that's why I focused on this topic. Um
- 01:26 - 01:29
The resistance of these innovations may also
- 01:29 - 01:32
fair between different urban local context because preference
- 01:32 - 01:36
of individuals chemical strained by the political framework
- 01:36 - 01:38
of the countries or city lived in.
- 01:38 - 01:38
So,
- 01:38 - 01:43
comparative case study is suitable for this topic
- 01:43 - 01:45
to see if there's actually a difference.
- 01:45 - 01:49
The first case study I selected is in the city of Thessaloniki.
- 01:49 - 01:52
Thessaloniki is the second biggest city in Greek,
- 01:52 - 01:55
it's the capital city of Central Macedonia.
- 01:55 - 01:58
It inhabitants over more than 320,000
- 01:59 - 01:59
ah
- 02:00 - 02:07
People. And uh in this, in this inner city area and over one million is greater area.
- 02:07 - 02:12
Um so this unique e can be characterized
- 02:12 - 02:13
as,
- 02:13 - 02:17
yeah, hi speeding at pedestrian crossings as also seen itself.
- 02:17 - 02:20
So the government decided to implement an
- 02:20 - 02:23
attendant road network to increase the safety of
- 02:23 - 02:27
pedestrians and they therefore get their data
- 02:27 - 02:30
to create these services on our website,
- 02:30 - 02:34
that the display to the inhabitants inhabitants can use this to
- 02:35 - 02:36
and for its congested areas.
- 02:36 - 02:39
So the traffic is more evenly distributed over the city.
- 02:39 - 02:46
This also means that roads that were usually quiet um government this year,
- 02:46 - 02:48
which also means that,
- 02:49 - 02:52
yeah, these vehicles have to slow down these roads,
- 02:52 - 02:57
forcing them get to slow down and which created safer environments.
- 02:57 - 02:58
So the second
- 02:59 - 03:02
case study is Amsterdam, as we all know.
- 03:02 - 03:05
Amsterdam is the capital city of the Netherlands
- 03:05 - 03:08
inhabitants over 800,000 people.
- 03:09 - 03:09
And recently,
- 03:09 - 03:14
there was a new law implemented in mainland where all inner city areas.
- 03:14 - 03:19
After that, the speed limits of 50 km/h, 30 km/h. um
- 03:20 - 03:22
which means uh, yeah,
- 03:22 - 03:26
the vehicles have to slow down that ISIS system can help them slow down.
- 03:26 - 03:28
What is the ISIS system.
- 03:28 - 03:33
This system is in steep adoption system where they
- 03:34 - 03:36
in enclosed and dynamic system.
- 03:36 - 03:42
They force vehicles to slow down by using a GPS system and digital roadmap.
- 03:43 - 03:48
Um, moreover, authorities can also uh, predefined speed limit,
- 03:48 - 03:50
I can change it during the day
- 03:50 - 03:54
based on for example constructions or really conditions.
- 03:54 - 03:57
So jumping next to my methods.
- 03:57 - 04:01
So here's where the sugar comes because most yeah,
- 04:01 - 04:04
researchers have used the latent class logic
- 04:04 - 04:07
model to assess the consumer citizens duality.
- 04:08 - 04:12
However, I need to go through that and I'm myself not an expert in voter,
- 04:12 - 04:14
neither is my supervisor.
- 04:14 - 04:14
So
- 04:15 - 04:17
I decided to come up with a new
- 04:17 - 04:18
method
- 04:19 - 04:22
and it was it was quite scary but also exciting because
- 04:22 - 04:25
this actually is a new contribution to the current literature.
- 04:25 - 04:31
So I've come up with measuring the level of acceptance by using metal items.
- 04:31 - 04:34
Um, and uh, yeah,
- 04:34 - 04:36
using his mobile items are using statistical
- 04:36 - 04:39
analysis to measure the level of acceptance.
- 04:39 - 04:41
I also,
- 04:41 - 04:45
I needed to frame the questions. So I had two surveys.
- 04:45 - 04:47
One survey based on consumer perspective.
- 04:47 - 04:49
The surface were yes,
- 04:49 - 04:55
the service questions were based on the eye perspective and um, personal benefits.
- 04:55 - 05:00
And also had to make a second survey based on the system perspective.
- 05:00 - 05:01
And these surfaces were based on
- 05:02 - 05:05
more on the collective benefits in the society as a whole.
- 05:06 - 05:11
So, by framing these questions differently, I created two different surveys.
- 05:11 - 05:14
I also had some items to measure their level of acceptance
- 05:14 - 05:17
as we can see here at base these items on current studies
- 05:18 - 05:20
and I will briefly go through them.
- 05:20 - 05:26
So the effort and performance except expectancies, sorry, measures.
- 05:26 - 05:27
Um Yeah,
- 05:27 - 05:30
if the participants think the innovation is
- 05:30 - 05:33
actually working because believes uh that the
- 05:33 - 05:39
more the higher the score in this item the more they accept innovation.
- 05:39 - 05:41
I also used the n items
- 05:41 - 05:42
used when it was to pay.
- 05:43 - 05:46
So these questions we're asking them how much they want
- 05:46 - 05:48
to pay for the innovation or how much the government
- 05:50 - 05:52
it has to pay for its innovation. And again, it's believed
- 05:53 - 05:58
the higher the score, the more they are accepting of this innovation.
- 05:58 - 06:03
Also used the social influence as an item as an item because
- 06:03 - 06:09
yeah your social environment influences your choices and your norms and values.
- 06:09 - 06:14
Um so I asked them about how the environment looked at um yeah,
- 06:14 - 06:19
look at innovation and how this might influence their decisions.
- 06:20 - 06:25
So long story short I haven't been able to release um
- 06:25 - 06:28
surface yet but they are done. So they were probably released this week
- 06:29 - 06:31
and continue forward on.
- 06:31 - 06:33
I hope that I will get our data really soon
- 06:33 - 06:38
and then I can start analyzing them and hopefully yeah,
- 06:38 - 06:40
I will finish it.
- 06:40 - 06:44
So are there any questions or remarks? Please let me know.
- 06:45 - 06:46
Thank you all for listening.