Audio Transcript Auto-generated
- 00:01 - 00:04
Hi and the commitment Well, we were going to talk
- 00:04 - 00:08
about the major implication of social revolutions in the Advancement
- 00:08 - 00:09
of Science and Technology.
- 00:10 - 00:12
We're in, we will answer these questions.
- 00:14 - 00:16
We're also going to talk about if we should do
- 00:16 - 00:18
science is superior in terms of giving us a picture
- 00:18 - 00:21
of reality in which we will answer these two questions.
- 00:23 - 00:24
Let's answer the first question.
- 00:25 - 00:29
What is the major implication of social revolutions in the
- 00:29 - 00:30
advancement of science?
- 00:30 - 00:37
Technology? Social evolution, emergence of science and technology advancement social
- 00:37 - 00:40
revolution became the starting point of the Advancement of Science
- 00:41 - 00:41
and technology.
- 00:42 - 00:46
Science and technology just quickly emerged as the people transformed
- 00:47 - 00:47
from being ignorant.
- 00:48 - 00:52
They're inventing things and making changes In the early 1500s,
- 00:53 - 00:55
people do not believe they are able to invent and
- 00:56 - 00:56
develop things.
- 00:57 - 01:00
The wealthy ones and those with power invest their money
- 01:01 - 01:03
in hopes that there would be legitimate and there would
- 01:03 - 01:06
be an order but never for the purpose of acquiring
- 01:06 - 01:10
new capabilities as they are already affordable in keeping what
- 01:10 - 01:10
they have.
- 01:12 - 01:15
When cognitive revolution started, people at the grasp of what
- 01:15 - 01:20
universe is However, people had a strong belief in scriptures
- 01:21 - 01:23
and all traditions green.
- 01:23 - 01:26
They only think that whatever they we do need are
- 01:26 - 01:28
the only important things in the world that needs to
- 01:28 - 01:28
be learned.
- 01:29 - 01:32
If something they see it's not in the scriptures, then
- 01:33 - 01:34
it is not important or relevant.
- 01:35 - 01:38
They will not bother discovering it on their own as
- 01:38 - 01:41
they can as someone wiser or just think it's not
- 01:41 - 01:46
important. It was all changed in 1517 when the Protestant
- 01:47 - 01:51
reform begun a smart Luther published a document disputation of
- 01:51 - 01:52
the power of indulgences.
- 01:54 - 01:54
Could you?
- 01:54 - 01:58
Deep in the church's teachings, it consists of 95 ideas
- 01:58 - 01:59
about Christianity.
- 02:00 - 02:05
When he invited people to debate with him, all those
- 02:05 - 02:10
contradictions in Christianity teachings is all about straightening it out
- 02:11 - 02:13
and stopping them from selling indulgences and not scientific.
- 02:15 - 02:18
This is where people started the revolutionists and look for
- 02:18 - 02:21
the things beyond what they are taught as it is
- 02:21 - 02:23
not considered as a scene anymore.
- 02:29 - 02:32
They were able to discover and invent things which resulted
- 02:32 - 02:35
to the betterment of their lights from their way of
- 02:35 - 02:38
thinking to the preparedness and natural disasters into the cure
- 02:39 - 02:40
for illnesses and injuries.
- 02:41 - 02:43
These are just some of the many discoveries and changes
- 02:44 - 02:50
that emerged because social revolutions happened to conclude social revolution.
- 02:51 - 02:55
Often the eyes, it is what pushed them to look
- 02:55 - 02:58
for explanations of the things that is not clear to
- 02:58 - 03:02
them and does not seem right without social revolution, will
- 03:02 - 03:04
not be able to have the courage to make changes.
- 03:05 - 03:09
Who might still be ignorant, believing in stories and using
- 03:09 - 03:11
scriptures as a basis to everything.
- 03:13 - 03:15
Moving on to our second question, should we deem science
- 03:16 - 03:18
is superior in terms of giving us a picture of
- 03:18 - 03:21
reality. Science is hard.
- 03:23 - 03:25
We should not consider science as superior.
- 03:26 - 03:30
It is not superior, but only a part of of
- 03:30 - 03:31
giving us a picture of reality.
- 03:33 - 03:35
This is not all about science as I believe that
- 03:35 - 03:39
science can do it alone because according to Albert Einstein,
- 03:40 - 03:41
science without religion is lame.
- 03:42 - 03:45
Religion without science is blind in this court.
- 03:46 - 03:48
He exposed the ignorance and arrogance of the people who
- 03:48 - 03:51
consider either either of one spear.
- 03:52 - 03:54
He also emphasized that none of the two can stand
- 03:55 - 03:57
alone as it will both be irrelevant.
- 04:00 - 04:03
You might ask how is this relevant to?
- 04:03 - 04:03
What are we talking about?
- 04:04 - 04:06
Why are we talking about religion now?
- 04:06 - 04:10
Well, I consider the religion is now outside spirited place
- 04:10 - 04:14
part in giving us a picture of reality which refuse
- 04:15 - 04:19
or fail to see Einstein's quote given emphasis on how
- 04:19 - 04:21
science can stand alone.
- 04:22 - 04:25
The outside spear which is as the environment.
- 04:26 - 04:30
What what to experience and other things place part and
- 04:30 - 04:32
giving us a picture of reality too.
- 04:33 - 04:36
Science will not be able to explain such things without
- 04:36 - 04:42
us giving evidence outside spirits, sciences senses and without it
- 04:42 - 04:47
it will be blind and just like Science outside spear
- 04:47 - 04:48
cannot stand alone too.
- 04:49 - 04:53
Whatever we observe, see and experience will not be rude
- 04:53 - 04:54
if it does not explained by science.
- 04:55 - 04:59
Yes, it might be real because we know what happened,
- 04:59 - 05:02
but that's what the court says, it will be lean,
- 05:03 - 05:04
will not be able to know what it is called
- 05:05 - 05:07
and what kind of feeling it it it is if
- 05:08 - 05:11
not explained by science, it will not be valid.
- 05:13 - 05:17
So if scientists not the only thing to do the
- 05:17 - 05:18
work, what a distinctive science disappear.
- 05:20 - 05:24
Well I believe that we think that way because this
- 05:24 - 05:26
is what we said on our minds and made us
- 05:26 - 05:27
just rely on it.
- 05:28 - 05:30
It stops us from looking at the bigger picture that
- 05:31 - 05:32
it's not all about science.
- 05:35 - 05:38
The truth is, there is no superior in terms of
- 05:38 - 05:39
giving us appreciate reality.
- 05:40 - 05:43
We and all the things that can be involved plays
- 05:44 - 05:44
a part in it.
- 05:45 - 05:46
Science can do it all alone.
- 05:47 - 05:48
It should be balanced.
- 05:49 - 05:52
We could always rely everything in science as it has
- 05:52 - 05:55
limitations with this.
- 05:55 - 05:57
I will end with this land from Me in for
- 05:57 - 05:57
its blog.
- 05:58 - 06:01
Not everything can be assessed and verified scientifically.
- 06:06 - 06:07
These are my references.
- 06:14 - 06:16
Yeah. Thank you.