Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Sudipta Lahiri, Digite
The Goal!
Inspect and adapt... don’t copy
It not adequate to implement a methodology, model or method
Think how you can make Continuous Improvement a routine that your team can follow without a second thought
@sudiptal
Define a vision
Should be challenge but not unreal
Identify the next step...
Don't think of the whole journey; accept that you don't know
Try to define the next step as a pattern!
Use a Kanban System to help define the pattern and the next step
Visualization + a desire for uniform cadence
Once you know the target condition, do quick PDCA
Don't focus on Pareto
Do "single factor" experiments"
@sudiptal
What is the target pattern/condition (the challenge)?
What is the actual condition now?
What obstacles are preventing you from reaching the target condition?
Which one are you addressing now?
What is your next step (starting PDCA)?
When can we go and see what we have learnt from the next step?
Accept that the path is unclear
“No Problem” = Problem
Small, incremental and rapid step
Sometimes in minutes; no detailed plan
Don’t lose time in trying to get the perfect step; take a bandaid step to see farther
This is where PDCA comes in
With single-factor experiments, not necessarily the biggest problem
As a mentor, let them experiment but keep them in the zone; don’t tell them what to do (too hard!)
There is value of learning through small errors; its more permanent in nature
It helps the mentor understand how the mentee thinks
Inputs for future training and improvement
Use a written document... A3... for a focussed discussion
Putting it down in one sheet is damn hard!
Needs extreme clarity to be concise
Don’t suggest the template to begin with... lead to something like it!
@sudiptal
Eliminate the supermarket... but don’t do it too fast!
Use Kanban to define the “next stage” of improvement journey
There is no point in seeing the same thing what you are doing today! There is no improvement...
@sudiptal
Menton-Mentee-Mentor-Mentee... Relationship
At lowel levels, Mentor is mostly the line manager; as you grow, the mentor changes to someone not in the line
Mentee is responsible for “doing”; mentor is responsible for the “outcome”
If the learner hasn’t learnt, the teacher hasn’t taught...
@sudiptal
@sudiptal
What’s the approach?
How is it different from what we do today?
Bottomline, this isn’t training OR workshop! You learn the art by doing it again and again and again... till your brain does it in an auto mode!
Think about how you drive...
KUMON...
@sudiptal,slahiri@digite.com
@sudiptal
Without a pattern:
You cannot identify where to improve...
You are not certain how to react to OR how the system will react to when you change something
Visible intent: produce only what we need
Invisible intent: support process improvement to provide a target condition by defining a relationship between stages of the value stream
In push systems, you dump work to downstream; rest is his problem!
@sudiptal
Senior Vice President, Digité
Agile/Lean practitioner (75%)
Lean Transformation of our own team
Developed SwiftKanban (www.swiftkanban.com), SwiftALM (www.digite.com)
Licensed user base of over 300,000
Agile Coach (25%)
Train and coach teams/organizations in Lean/Agile
Run the LimitedWIP Societies in India
Use it for defining the next steps... and to manage the team
Resolve/maneuver through the obstacles
@sudiptal
Our response should NOT BE from the team members...
Why? Because if the problem is quickly fixed, you will not be able to address the root cause
Too strongly influenced by your pain..
Its simply too late!
We don’t look into what is happening now
Root cause trail is cold
The “Other” bucket
Our response has to be immediate
@sudiptal
Team Members:
Limited impact
Voluntary improvement activity
Train them to think of kaizen
Identify who is ready to go to the next level
Leaders/Managers:
90% impact
50% of their time!
Part of their job function
Cost reduction via improvement in productivity and quality
@sudiptal
@sudiptal
It does not happen with... training, classroom sessions or ToDo or Checklists!
Best case scenario:
We get a “scattered” set of improvements
These are not generally directed in any specific direction
Without a vision, once you address these improvements, you get a static system
You can’t predict the outcome!
In the most common scenario:
Action items don’t get closed; over time, team loses faith, quality of feedback drops
Often, too many items and too many “organizational” items
Freshers, attrition, requirements are not well defined, etc.
Rarely, problems within the team are identified!
Rarely, a 5Why analysis to get to “real” Root Cause
This is where "Coaching Kata" comes in
@sudiptal
Picture by Mike Rother
Improvement Kata
A routine that helps you to improve, adapt and evolve
Coaching Kata
A routine that makes the experienced leaders and managers teach the Improvement Kata to everyone
... routines that help its people continuously improve and evolve... systematically, not as a special initiative
A way of keeping 2 things in alignment, synchronized with each other: A) The system B) The continuously changing environment
We don’t control the environments around us but we can control how to manage them
Kata is not a technique, not a principle
It’s much deeper.... it’s part of work, everyday
@sudiptal
Small incremental steps, adjusting along the way, continuously
Relying on periodic retrospectives assumes a system that is “temporarily” static
Standards that don’t keep continuously improving bring down system performance because system characteristics keep changing
@sudiptal
@sudiptal
What Toyota values...
It values organization’s routines for improvement and adaptation for competitive advantage and long term success
Not quantitative/financial targets
“ Toyota has long considered its ability to permanently resolve problems and then improve stable processes as one of the company’s competitive advantages.
- Kathi Hanley, Toyota”
Are we missing the point?
Should we have a different perspective?
Are we really happy with how Agile teams have performed so far?
Have the retrospectives delivered the results we were told they will deliver?
Toyota is one of the most open organizations
There are many known practices that are widely adopted
Andon, Kanban, Jidoka, Heijunka...
There is so much talk about ‘Continuous Improvement’
A3 sheets, others...
Yet, the success of Toyota rarely been replicated... why?
Even within Japanese companies
.... it all comes down to Toyota’s key values!
Teams need to be adapt and continuously improve
External and internal environments are changing continuously; you can’t predict how they will develop
We jump to “implementation”...
to implement methodologies (with certifications!)
We copy what we see...
... forgetting that some of these practices and principles were a response to their issues, their problems
@sudiptal
Picture by Mike Rother
@sudiptal