What is the purpose?
Who is your audience?
What appeals or techniques
does the argument use?
How does the language or style of the argument work to persuade an audience?
What authorities does the argument rely on?
Whose interests are served? Who gains or loses by it?
Tell how these things work together to help the argument succeed...or fail.
Bad claim: "This editorial has good pathos and ethos, but lousy logos."
Which of its rhetorical features will likely influence readers most? It's connections with the audience? Emotional appeals? Style?
How can I describe what this argument achieves?
How do the rhetorical elements interact?
How do you normally think about taxes and how is this ad trying to change those ideas?
Why would
"fast" be attractive?
Why not "accurate"
or "secure"?
What do MP3's have to
do with taxes?
What relationship does
the target audience have
with the internet? Are some
people more likely to trust
their taxes to the internet
than others?
How important is individuality to the target audience? How does this ad use words and layout to get at that?
How has this model been dressed? Why
a backpack, choker, and this ridiculous
hat? What is she supposed to look like?
Ethos?
Logos?
Pathos?
What are "young adults"?
Do young people do taxes?
Is that really the target of this ad?
The ad doesn't
urge you to
"sign up now" but
to "learn more."
Why would they
choose this type of
low pressure approach?
In an internet ad, the reader can simply click a link to get more information or sign up. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this approach compared to print and tv ads?
A method for studying and understanding
any sort of communication
Does the argument have a clear purpose? Who is its audience?