Loading…
Transcript

Regional Economic

Development Landscape

2015 Activity

  • 8 Recruitment wins
  • 7 Expansion wins
  • 17 Business Growth wins
  • 105 unique business visits

CREDC

Clark County

GPI

2016 Initiatives

Lands for Jobs

Economic development: What does it look like?

Presentation Overview

  • Economic Development in Clark County
  • What is economic development?
  • What does economic development activity look like?
  • Who are the players?
  • What are Clark County’s main economic development challenges?

• New company moves into/is recruited into the area

• Existing company expands/invests capital

• Existing company stays in our community

• Successful event that brings hundreds to our community

• New or improved park

• New or improved library or other public buildings/facilities

• Improved main street entrance to community

• New store fronts, sidewalks and street lights

• New funding for organization

Accelerating Business Growth & Innovation

What is Economic Development?

“Economic development is about positioning the economy on a higher growth trajectory.”

(Feldman, 2014)

Whither our economy?

An introduction to economic development in Clark County

Economic Development Update to

Board of Clark County Councilors

Economic Development: A Team Sport

Presented by: Jeff Swanson, Economic Development Director

February 3, 2016

Infrastructure & Property Development, Recruitment

  • Utilities (electric, water, waste water, natural gas, etc.
  • Port Districts
  • Government (Federal, State, Local & Tribal)

Tourism

Business Development & Recruitment, Coalition Building, Business Climate & Quality of Life

Presented by: Mike Bomar, President

  • Visitors & Convention Bureau
  • Chambers of Commerce
  • Main Street and Downtown Associations
  • Economic development councils
  • Business Community
  • Chambers of Commerce
  • Small Business Development Centers (US SBA)
  • Government (Federal, State, Local & Tribal)

What are Clark County’s main economic development challenges?

February 3, 2016

Workforce Development

Access to Capital, Funding

& Technical Assistance

  • Revolving and Micro-Loan Funds
  • Angel Investors
  • Small Business Development Centers (US SBA)
  • Government (Federal, State, Local & Tribal)
  • School Districts (K-12)
  • Career & Technical Education (CTE)
  • Community Colleges
  • Vocational Schools
  • Higher Educational Institutions
  • Business Community
  • Economic Development Council
  • Government (Federal, State, Local & Tribal)

• Structural changes in the economy

• Labor force demographics and changing preferences of workers

• Land, storm water, transportation and utilities infrastructure

Structural Changes in the Economy

Other Economic Development Priorities

Clark County Employment Land Study

Questions?

LFJ To Date

  • Determine the supply and readiness of employment land sites
  • Build consensus on terminology for large parcels and site readiness
  • Inform discussion about future land use tools and policies
  • Opportunity for alignment with greater Portland’s 2014 large lot study
  • Creates framework for ongoing updates

LFJ Committee

Board Awards

Thank you!

  • 2011 volunteer land inventory assessment
  • 2011 lands for jobs (LFJ) committee formalized
  • 2012-2015 LFJ subcommittees established, meet regularly
  • 2014 discussions begin on next steps for 2011 project
  • 2015 RFP released for employment lands study and project contracted
  • 2016 Project launches
  • Staff Leads: Elizabeth Scott & Mike Bomar
  • Formalized in 2011
  • Members include both public and private sector partners
  • CREDC serves as a convener to promote this community-led initiative
  • Input and directives also come from quarterly EcDev Partners (EDP) meetings

High Level Investors

Land for Jobs

Economic Development Plan Update

Project Timeline

Ongoing LFJ

Efforts 2017

PHASE 1B

(March-May 2016)

PHASE 1A

(December 2015-February 2016)

Mike Bomar, President

mbomar@credc.org

Phone: 360-694-5006

  • Engage stakeholders and project advisory group
  • Site inventory completed
  • Outreach campaign for stakeholders
  • Form project advisory group
  • Develop project website
  • Frame consensus on key metrics
  • Develop target industries profiles with infrastructure demands
  • Study will influence economic development plan update slated for 2017
  • Outcomes of the report will shape LFJ committee initiatives
  • Policy tool can be used for future comprehensive planning

PHASE 2

(June – October 2016)

Legislative Priorities

  • Prepare a detailed development analysis to determine market opportunities and economic impacts of potential industrial users as well as actions, requirements, and costs needed to address any barriers to site development
  • La Center
  • Ridgefield
  • Battle Ground
  • Port of Ridgefield
  • Vancouver
  • Port of Vancouver
  • Washougal
  • Camas
  • CWEDA
  • Port of Camas-Washougal