Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Good:
- Effective use of camera angles
- Great variety of shots
- Good continuity in techniques such as match-on-action
Bad:
- Before entrance to building the camera shaked
- Use of mid-shot onto torso could have been varied with tilts/pans/etc
- More variety of angles and techniques for the dialogue
- Transistion of the "what?!" at the end needs to be more smoother. It looked abrupt and out of place
Good:
- Nice and subtle title sequence but effective
- Sophistocated and formal, in accordance to the conventions we are trying to achieve
- Sustains continuity of rest of the film
Bad:
- Did not look significant
- Too simple
Good:
- Conveyed a good sense of proffesionalism which is good for the secret service themed narrative
- Appropiate pace in most of the film
- Mise-en-scen: setting of bedroom/blood/suits/surroundings
- Authenticity was good
Bad:
- Blood needs to be more authentic
- Confusion as why it was black and white in the beginning
- Dialogue does not comply with the conventions of a secret service type narrative. Was too colloquioal
- Pink alarm clock inhibits authenticity of beggining
Good:
- Choice of locations was good
- Presented narrative well
Bad:
- Framing was slightly slanted, unproffesional
- Fast pace cuts distorted sense of depression and slow nature
- Music sounded too unnerving and tended more towards the horror-type