THE ITOS/OCHA COD service update process
The process is
There is no financial cost for CO /RO
1. Evaluate, document and create potential COD Candidates
Based on OCHA guidelines
CODs already registered on hrresponse.info or submitted directly to ITOS for evaluation
CODs are provided as live services
Multiple language support
Accepted candidate deployed as live services
Funding provided by
Virginia
discarded slides
Live Services
Dowloadable zip archives
Questions:
COD: The Common Operational Datasets (CODs) are critical datasets that are used to support the work of humanitarian actors across multiple sectors. They are considered a de facto standard for the humanitarian community and should represent the best-available datasets for each theme.
Display and query for ESRI or OGC clients
ESRI Map, WMS, KML Image Overlay
Problems and detected bottlenecks:
While those assumptions are correct, does not mean that the task will not have to be carried out .
In an emergency the task wil have to be accomplished in record time...
What does OCHA FIS propose to solve that issue?
Map services based on
Name labels, capitals, and geometry
Pcode labels for all clients; feature extraction for OGC clients
ESRI Map, WMS, WFS, KML Network Link
http://goo.gl/XsdfJR
Feature extraction for ESRI clients
Solutions:
https://goo.gl/OVqZih
Common Issues
In Admin and Populated Places candidates that can be resolved
Same Name and PCode for Adjacent Admin Units
PCODES not fully constructed, or out of date
PCODES Not Consistent
COD Identification and layer selection
Under guidance from IMO,
ITOS evaluates CODs
Candidate delivered as file geodatabase
Creates report about issues found and fixed
Stakeholders and partners decide which datasets are CODs
Writes 19115 metadata
Creates additional table of admin levels
Mali
Jordan
Creates packages in 12 formats - suitable for HDX
Places fall outside
admin boundary
Inconsistent Spellings Among Data Layers
Topology Errors
Red and orange marks show gap and overlap errors
Multiple Points Representing One Populated Place
3 records with the same geometry.
They have unique p-codes and slightly different spellings but represent the same place. It needs to be one record with alternate spellings located in the Alternate Name fields
Inconsistent Geometries Among Data Layers
Topololgy: slivers,
gaps, nesting
STATUS Map
https://goo.gl/OVqZih
A recurrent problem:
Situation: Breaking news!
There has been a 7.8 earthquake in the country of Robertalia. Seems districts of Ara, Bera and Cira have been hard hit. Thousands gather on the streets , and some buildings have collapsed, general hospital at Ara has been destroyed...
So UN is starting to plan an emergency relief operation...
Conversations liker this follow in many agencies HQ and CO...
Managers office: Ok team...lets get there fast...give me all the COD and basic data about Robertalia...Do we know where those Ara, Bera and Cira districts are? Which cities are located there? How many people are living there? where is the nearest airport?
IM Team leader: here you are, Dataset we got are from 1999, when last earthquake occurred. But we have not updated it...you know it is hard to work with Robertalia statistical office and ourt IMO have been working in other tasks...
Managers office: I don't care. We must solve the situation. I want updated data..why we did not work on having clean datasets . Coordinate an IMWG and try to get the best data you can!
...meanwhile n the new, in hudnders of skypegroups., chats, irq..
IMO 1: I have found a dataset i downloaded from Google but have no clue of the source or the year it represents. DH, SBTF and HOT are working on reviewing all they can find on Robertalia with he volunter communities...They will come out with something soon...
IMO 2: A friend of mine shared with me this map of the country he was holding from the time he was here with an NGO, but it is from 2002 and administrative division have undergone revision....
IMO 3: UNHCR claims this admin dataset is the most up to date one, but is different from the one that OCHA is providing...partners are doubting which one is the one to use...Metadata is missing
IMO 4: whatever... I will use what I can find and report on my stuff and map all I need. We will later see how we solve that issue of layers in the IMWG (what a boring meeting we had last week...)my boss wants the maps out by next sitrep.
Does it sound familiar?