만나보세요
새로운 프레젠테이션 도우미가 기다리고 있어요.
뎌욱 빠르게 컨텐츠를 다듬고, 보강하고, 편집하고, 원하는 이미지를 찾고, 시각자료를 편집하세요.
트렌드 검색
We believe that a more effective focus on business capabilities, rather than on IT, can help us all keep out of the IT poo (of which there seems to be a rather lot nowadays).
To avoid doubt: this is not about project management or software development methods, but we hope that the ideas in this presentation will help you make better choices about those methods.
Remember, the big words in blue, like "Experiment", represent a set of behaviours related to the management of a business capability.
...the Road of Doom: the road that leads directly from Experiment to Exploit. If you only read one frame in this presentation, make it this one.
Even if you have done a proper bang up job of Experiment, do not let yourself believe that you can go straight to Exploit (and subsequent Knighthood) without passing Explore. It mostly doesn't work.
Disturbingly, it's easy to find folks ready to provide you luxury coaches with very nice drivers, co-drivers, conductors, navigators, mechanics and heavens knows who else, to take you on this road. For a fare.
So, give yourself a good talking-to, tell yourself there is a better way and read the bit about Explore again.
Exploit is about capturing for the long-term, the innovation and learning developed in Explore and then getting long term value out of it. It is where all the heavy-lifting goes on to put in place effective, reliable, supportable capabilites at a reasonable cost.
This is Exploit. We have moved down the grid. Current Benefit is strong and growing but unrealised future benefit is decreasing, because it is being ...er realised.
This will be familiar from an IT perspective, but it is not at all a place for traditional-style waterfall capability delivery to carry on as before. Because Explore has preceeded: Exploit will start in a different place. Customers will know what they want (in fact they will already have most of it, although it might be a bit flakey) and there will be an eager and supportive community of users and developers involved. Big IT delivery will be easier and a whole lot less risky.
...Pilots. Sadly it's fall-off-log easy to get Explore wrong: "We did a pilot, didn't we?".
A pilot (or a trial) that is part of a big design up front implementation is, by our definition, not Explore. When a big design is done first and a pilot set up as validation, learning is constrained. Explore means genuinely exploring: learning about the jungle, hacking paths through thick vegetation, crossing torrents (waterfalls?), wearing pith helmets, wrestling with crocs and all that stuff. It is not about completing pilot milestones.
This axis of the grid here shows Current Benefit: the actual strategic benefit being delivered by a capability as felt by those involved with it.
The 'felt' bit is important.
Although we said that this model wasn't about project or development methodologies - if ever there was a place for Agile methods, this is it...
But... emergent capabilities are going to be a bit flakey. Using them for real is risky. And this risk must be managed. By the people involved. Eyeball to eyeball. Day by day.
At the same time, they get substantial benefit from the new capability as they grow it. Which is nice.
They learn also how to help people learn about the new capability and the technology that supports it. In later stages, when the capability is to be used by many more people, this will be vital.
Explore is when people learn, together, how capabilities might be made to work differently in practice and how customers might be encouraged to behave differently. Incrementally, they adapt the technology to capture that learning. Then...
...they learn a bit more.
incremental
Explore is gradual
Explore is when people come together...
...customers, users, developers, managers of users, managers of developers, managers of mangers, procurers, policy dudes, legal folk, commercial people. Anybody who has an interest.
It's about collaboration.
Explore is when promising capabilities that have proved themselves in Experiment are grown.
Explore is the important bit.
Where the gold is.
This is Explore. We have moved further right on the grid: Current Benefit up even more; potential for the future growing.
...Technology Demonstrators. They demonstrate technology not business benefit. No way do they count in Experiment. They are still ideas; no matter how shiny or promising.
Mostly, Experiment is about people... innovating.
It's quite possible that there will be no new technology involved at this stage. Better to start with exercising the new process with existing tools (white boards, spreadsheets, whatever).
Experiments should deliver business benefit quickly; if they don't, they should be binned or re-energised.
Experiment is when the roots of the community that will sustain the new capability through its growth to maturity are put down.
Experiment is about establishing the potential of a capability by demonstrating some Current Benefit and thereby creating enthusiasm for future potential.
No enthusiasm: no success.
This is Experiment. We have moved right on the grid. Stuff is happening and the new ideas are showing some value.
Exhaust is about extracting every last ounce of benefit from a capability (and being bold about shutting it down when the cost of supporting it exceeds the benefit it delivers).
This is Exhaust. We have moved left on the grid: Current Benefit is waning (although perhaps very slowly). The capability is a commodity and no longer makes a strategic contribution.
Tricky concept here: as a capability matures, its future benefit becomes understood and begins delivering serious Current Benefit, it will fall on this axis.
This axis shows Future Benefit. It is the magnitude of the unrealised strategic potential of a capability as felt by those involved with it.
Someone has an idea to create or improve a business capability. The idea will have loads of potential Future Benefit but it won't have any Current Benefit (cos it's still an idea). So it doesn't yet qualify for the first box...
And, of course, we have a model...
To provide a framework for understanding the changing management needs of IT-enabled business capabilities through their life-cycles (and avoiding big mistakes).
We call it the
With thanks to John Ward whose excellent ideas this model is based on and to MDB for the "4ex" name (and all manner of other inspiration)
And encouragingly (as most of our work is with UK Government) this man seems to think so too...
Actually,this is about how to think about buiness capability
Click the Right arrow
Expire!
We will look at each state in order. Starting at the beginning...
The model describes four possible states that a business capability can be in:
These are based on the balance of current and unrealised potential future business benefit of the capability...
...and their names represent the management behaviours associated with each state.
Each occupies one of the four boxes in the model.
The rest of this presentation explains the features of these states and highlights stuff to watch out for.
What does this tell you?
What does this tell you?
What does this tell you?
You could get loads of folks involved with the capability to email in 10 words each, paste all of them into http://wordle.net to create a communal word cloud and see what the result tells you.
But, if you are gasping for more...
We're done. There is loads more to say, but you have probably had enough.