Chiara Ohoven and the strange tale of hard working German men.

Chiara became a minor

celebrity, when she botched

plastical surgery on her lips.

This was for some months

regularly featured by a German

comedian. It led to some minor TV

engagements and presence in the

tabloid press.

And now something completely different.

Wikipedia: "In particular, the Protestant ethic

(or more specifically, Calvinist ethic)

motivated the believers to work hard,

be successful in business and

reinvest their profits in further development rather than frivolous pleasures. The notion of calling meant that each individual had to take action in order to be saved"

Which of course means

Why?

So for example

An Authorship that

doesn't value happiness

and glamour

will behave grumpingly

at best.

An authorship

whose values mirror

the 19 century

will distort the view

on the modern world

This is bad!

A 21st century

tool purports

a 19th century

worldview

Thank

You!

Let me start with

Chiara Ohoven

A minor German celebrity

Chiara Ohoven

and the strange tale

of hard working

German men

The Opposite of

Dirk Franke

de.User:southpark

Must show

Which lead

to salvation

"Time is money"

Wikimania 2011 Haifa

Merit

and

"Those

[lips]

are

real"

Achievement

The perfect object

of an article

A Man

Virtue

Protestant

Work ethics

Individual

Could be:

Notability guidelines

Everything that has a source

who is important

Famous by birth

what is notable?

Could be:

Rules and Interpretation

Her father is rich

Everything that makes no problems (e.g. living people)

Her mother is a society lady and UNESCO special envoy

Max Weber

Famous by failure

Could be:

She botched plastical surgery on her lips

Interpreted by values of the community

values

Made her a TV personality 2005/2006 and gave her some light as tabloid commentator

show

Community

attitudes

German sociologist

of the early 20th century

I will talk about

in de.wp

NPOV

They are influenced by

Chiara lives in a world

by some ethical concept

This is the German Wikipedia I am talking about

I think I will talk about a lot which can be said about all Wikipedias

According to

Mainly: bias

which is central to Enlightenment

and Modernism

Bias of the educated men

But I do think this is especially strong in the German Wikipedia

of happiness

which was described by

and glamour

Fourth Löschdiskussion

Fifth Löschdiskussion

No

Salvation for Chiara Ohoven

She has done

First Löschdiskussion

shrouded in mystery

NOTHING

Second Löschdiskussion

Keep "was in serious talk-shows"

Third Löschdiskussion

"Deleted" no relevance

to deserve it

Fourth Löschdiskussion

Fifth Löschdiskussion

...

Ninth Löschdiskussion

No Happiness

Why?

"In my opinion presence

in tabloids, hits on google

or being "daughter of" means

nothing for relevance."

No Glamour

Ann Dunham

Mother of

Barack Obama

Which is

not limited

to Chiara

Lucy Pinder

Glamour

model

Mothers

Daphne Rosen

Israeli porn actress

Porn stars

Models

can get salvation

(Female) Porn stars

Victims

Wifes

Must have won award

Problem of all Wikipedias

Is this bad?

Ksenija Pajčin

In a project

in which

the biggest incentive

Singer and murder victim

from Serbia

Jane Wilde

Individual award

Wife of Stephen Hawking

Yes

is Fun

Salvation is eminent for

Have achieved something

Athletes

Scientists

Scholars

Officials

Achievement

Merit

Work

They did something

Pictures:

Lucy Pinder: Photographer: en.User: Deltasquared CC-BY-SA 3.0

Ksenija Pajčin: Photographer: sr:User:Goldfinger CC-0

Daphne Rosen: Copyright-Holder: Daphne Rosen CC-0

XRCO: Photographer: Glenn Francis CC-BY-SA 3.0