Introducing
Your new presentation assistant.
Refine, enhance, and tailor your content, source relevant images, and edit visuals quicker than ever before.
Trending searches
Markup for citation linking
Markup for display
JATS XML can be redisplayed in interesting ways
NCBI
Markup for archiving
Articles extracted from BHL should be archived (e.g., PubMed Central)
NCBI manages their own identifiers...
... and a large number of third-party databases build on these identifiers
<Markup?/>
Citation graph
Cameron, R. D. (1997). A Universal Citation Database. First Monday, 2(4). doi:10.5210/fm.v2i4.522
Who builds the knowledge graph?
Shotton, D. (2013). Publishing: Open citations. Nature, 502(7471), 295–297. doi:10.1038/502295a
Easy markup use cases
Questions are paths in the knowledge graph
Identifiers from ORCID, DOI, and ISSN, services from CrossRef
Bibliography
Phylogeography
- archive of articles
- displaying articles
- citation linking
Taxonomy
Spatial search
Taxonomy
(expanded)
Biodiversity Knowledge Graph
What do I want?
Do we need markup?
Just need to extract entities and assertions
- extract named entities, identifiers, localities
- extract relationships (e.g., these names are synonyms)
- in other words, extract edges in the knowledge graph
My questions:
@rdmpage
Do we need markup, or is indexing good enough?
Markup for archiving, or better still, for version controlled editing
Does markup generate knowledge?
If so, what have we learnt to date from marked up literature?