Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Evolution vs. Creationism
Transcript of Evolution vs. Creationism
-we were raised to believe that Creationism was more credible than Evolution.
-to inform others about which idea is more credible.
-for reassurance that there is a divine being. Credibility of
Evolution vs. Creationism We chose this topic because: an idea that suggesting that species that looked like each other were related. however, species can look totally different, yet have the same homologous anatomy. This destroys the concept of homology. however, species can look totally different, yet have the same homologous anatomy. This destroys the idea of homology. however, species can look totally different, yet have the same homologous anatomy. This destroys the idea of homology. however, species can look totally different, yet have the same homologous anatomy. This destroys the idea of homology. however, species can look totally different, yet have the same homologous anatomy. This destroys the idea of homology. Miller/Urey Experiment of 1953 -Evolutionists refer spontaneous biogenisis with the experiment of Miller/Urey experiment of 1953.
-This experiment was used to simulate the Earth's early atmosphere.
-The experiment had created the necessary amino acids, which are the foundations of life, but it had created both left and right-handed amino acids.
-Life only requires the left-handed amino acids, but living matter cannot consist both of these amino acids.
-Which means the formation of living matter to non-living matter by mere chance is just a speculation. Bat and Dugong, are obviously different species. However, they have the same forearm (five fingers). They have the same pattern of structure. we can't automatically assume that humans and apes are related just because we have similar bone structures. THEREFORE, HOWEVER the field of paleanthropology found the "missing link" that connected man and ape! Example: Nebraska Man William Jennings Bryans stunned the evolution community with the claim that he found the tooth of the Nebraska Man. After years of trial, they found the whole body in which the tooth belonged. It was from a extinct pig. not. those "proofs" were merely frauds. 2nd fraud, a more guilty one. -Piltdown man was found in England.
-Charles Dawson claimed that the skull was -the missing link of origin of man.
-Interestingly, the skull didn't fit into the ancestral tree. Turned out that this, was chemically stained to make it look more ancient. Not only that, but the teeth were also filed down. Designer? -Everything we know of needs a designer.
-Whether the creation of a computer or in the lab with experiments.
-Experiments need the scientist to bring everything together and eventually discover or create something.
-A computer is not created by chance if all the needed material is placed in the same environment. Vs. It would be foolish to assume that if we placed all the necessary components of a computer in one environment that it would spontaneously become a fully complete and running computer. So how can it be logical to assume that the human body, which is more complex than a computer, can be created by just having the necessary components in a closed environment? Rachel Lee
Ms. Spangenberg Fossils due to flood? In the Bible, people had excessive sinful lifestyles that God finally chose to punish his people...
He sent 40 days and 40 nights of rain to wipe out the corrupted mankind. A proof that the great flood mentioned in the Bible did happen. Strangely, marine fossils were found on top of mountains.
This strongly suggested that the flood had washed up the sea life onto high land Evolutionists tried to prove that statement otherwise with the
concept of land mass collisions. Supposedly, the moving plates caused
the uplift of sea beds. Works Cited Taylor, Ian T. In the Minds Of Men: Darwin and the New World Order. 1987a ed. Toronto: TFE, 1984, 19987, 1991. Print. Ser. 218.
Wiebe, Garbe D. "Creation vs. Evolution." Garth D. Wiebe and BonnieJean P. Wiebe. Web. 28 Mar. 2011. <http://www.wiebefamily.org/e.htm>.
Ratkevich, Ron. "FOSSIL PRESERVATION." T-rat.com. Web. 28 Mar. 2011. <http://www.trat.com/Pages/FossilPreservation.html>.
"Nebraska Man Hoax." Home Page ~ Roger Lindsey. Web. 28 Mar. 2011. <http://rdlindsey.com/flashfacts/Nebraska.html>.
Harter, Richard. "Piltdown Man." Piltdown Man. 30 Oct. 2006. Web. 28 Mar. 2011. <http://www.tiac.net/~cri_a/piltdown/piltdown.html>
"Great Flood." Creation - AllAboutCreation.org. Web. 28 Mar. 2011. <http://www.allaboutcreation.org/great-flood-faq.htm>.
"Genesis." The New English Bible; New Testament. [New York]: Oxford UP, 1961. Print.
Fossils Formed Fast. Digital image. Creation Concepts. Web. 27 Mar. 2011. <http://creationconcepts.org/resources/FOSSILS.pdf>.
"After Their Kind, the Genetics of the Plant and Animal Creations." Accuracy in Genesis, NEW Perspectives Affirming Biblical Creation Record, New Scriptual Biblical Creation Genesis Research Studies. Web. 28 Mar. 2011. <http://www.accuracyingenesis.com/kind.html>. Annotated Bibliography Adamson, Marilyn. "Does God Exist - Six Reasons to Believe That God Is Really There - Existence of God - Proof of God." Ask Questions about Life and God. Web. 28 Mar. 2011. <http://www.everystudent.com/features/isthere.html>.
Marilyn answers questions that are frequently asked and also gives a list in how creationism answer more questions than evolution. For example, what is the probability in everything being exactly perfect to have the conditions for life, such as oxygen, water, gases, etc. There is only one answer, that a divine creator or designer provided all of these things and created life.
"The Biblical Flood, Noah's Flood, the Deluge of the Scriptural Genesis Record." Accuracy in Genesis, NEW Perspectives Affirming Biblical Creation Record, New Scriptual Biblical Creation Genesis Research Studies. Web. 28 Mar. 2011. <http://www.accuracyingenesis.com/biblicalflood.html>.
This talks about the Flood and proving it, therefore leading to the point that the Bible is credible and if a part of the Bible is deemed credible then the whole thing should be viewed as credible and a legitimate source. Therefore Genesis being able to be viewed accurate with the creation of life and the Earth.
"Creation vs. Evolution." Garth D. Wiebe and BonnieJean P. Wiebe. Web. 28 Mar. 2011. <http://www.wiebefamily.org/e.htm#0.>.
The website of the Wiebe family break down the theories of Creationism and Evolution. Wiebe supports Creationism rather than Evolution and gives specific facts and reasons, from chance, experiments, fossils, dating, and even the difference in human species that were found to be all fake. Wiebe uses an incredible amount of sources to back up the finding and information provided.
Gudmundson, Darrell. Creation and Evolution. First ed. GFW, 2008. Print.
Creation from this point forward may be of two kinds; it may flow from desire, or it may be the product of some random fluctuation. Gudmundson writes that since we know of no mechanism by which random fluctuation would produce the sort of complexity we are familiar with, creation began as a nonrandom act.
"The Heavens. In the Beginning God Created the Heavens and the Earth. God Stretches out the Heavens." Accuracy in Genesis, NEW Perspectives Affirming Biblical Creation Record, New Scriptual Biblical Creation Genesis Research Studies. Web. 28 Mar. 2011. <http://www.accuracyingenesis.com/heavens.html>.
This website compares the Bible to astrological stand points. Literally the heavens with God and the universe. It shows evidence that the Bible is very accurate in the steps in which the Earth is said to come into being. With light, darkness, days, months, seasons, water, etc. This gives more credibility towards the Bible and the theory of Creationism
Houdmann, S. Michael. Got Questions?: Bible Questions Answered : Answers to the Questions People Are Really Asking. Enumclaw, WA: Pleasant Word, 2009. Print.
Houdmann faces the everyday questions and how the bible answers them on creation and evolution. What was recommended for information on creation was Genesis and the Institute for Creation Research. It answers many question such as does faith in God and science contradict? Hyers, Conrad M. The Meaning of Creation: Genesis and Modern Science. Atlanta: John Knox, 1984. Print.
Conrad Hyers offers a welcome respite from the counter-productive effects of extremism that surround the creation issue. Focusing on the creation texts from the book of Genesis, Hyers interprets the biblical account in light of its relationship to its culture, context, and purpose. This has been a controversial topic for decades.
Jacobs, John. Creation vs. Evolution: Do You Know All the Facts? Mustang, OK: Tate & Enterprises, 2009. Print.
This book talks about how there are misconceptions in how the media depicts the controversy of the scientific and religious divisions. John Jacobs talks about his experience and knowledge that there are many scientists that believe in God and have their own personal viewpoints as to how creation has taken place. This is very interesting because it shows that even though one may have firm belief in one thing, people still have their own viewpoints and perspectives.
Lowrance, James M. Christian Answers to the Theory of Evolution. Createspace, 2010. Print.
This book states that just for the sake of the argument if it took 10 million years for apes to evolve into a modern man, that would mean there should be a significant change after every 50,000 years, there would be 200 categorical stages of man. Yet there are no such significant changes nor proof of it. Also gives many Biblical references as evidence.
Muncaster, Ralph O. Creation vs. Evolution. Eugene, Or.: Harvest House, 2000. Print.
This book talks about how scientists of the elite field of microbiology, biochemistry, physics, and applied mathematics now favor creation as the probable alternative. This is due to the discoveries in the last few years that added immense evidence for creation. This shows that there is more evidence and back up for creationism and how even scientists are coming to accept that there is a divine creator.
"Piltdown Man." Creation - AllAboutCreation.org. Web. 28 Mar. 2011. .
This website talks about the missing links between man and ape, and reveals that most of these findings have turned out to be false and fake. Also it helps to show that there hasn't been any record of fossils that show the slow and gradual evolution between ape and man. This gives more proof and evidence that evolution's theories are wrong and have flaws in them.
Scott, Eugenie C. Evolution vs. Creationism: an Introduction. Berkeley: University of California, 2005. Print.
Eugenie Carol Scott breaks down the pillars of evolution and creationism and plainly states that these two theories are incompatible and gives reason why. Scott also talks about how there are ways of knowing through logic, science, authority and revelation. This goes into depth of both evolution and creationism which gives perspective to both theories. Evolution Theories CREATIONISM EVOLUTION