Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
The Language of Light
Transcript of The Language of Light
Sound and meaning
Thank you for (g)listening!
The Language of Light
Some sounds, like [gl], can refer to concepts like “light”.
Ferdinand de Saussure argued that signs consist of two parts
Ferdinand de Saussure
Swiss linguist, known for structuralism and semiotics (the study of signs)
the sounds that make up “tree”: [t], [r], [i:]
Words and their meaning
Saussure suggested that the connection between the signifier [tri:] and the concept is
In English, is [tri:], but in Hungarian it is [fa] and in Swahili it is [mti].
What makes a word?
Words consist of smaller units: sounds like [t], [r], [i:].
We create meaning from meaningless units:
“duality of patterning”
Etymology: in Proto-Indo-European, spoken 5000 years ago,
meant “to shine”
Light across languages
Let's play a little game: which words sound (and look!) like light?
Which ones refer to light? And why?
Wait a second...
Words that “sound” like light? Light doesn't make a sound...
Words that “look” like light?
Sign languages! They do not relate
and meaning but
Glistening snow from http://www.makeitcolourful.com/challenges/challenge-16-sparkling-snow-and-ice
Glitter from http://asphyxiate-stock.deviantart.com/art/Rainbow-Glitter-Texture-194687034 and
Glow from http://www.blirk.net/abstract-wallpaper/40/1920x1080/
Ferdinand de Saussure from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_de_Saussure
BSL videos from the BSL sign bank: http://bslsignbank.ucl.ac.uk/
kiki/bouba: Ramachandran, V.S. and E.M. Hubbard. 2001. “Synaesthesia — A window into perception, thought and language”.
Journal of Consciousness Studies
ABSL: Sandler, W., M. Aronoff, I. Meir and C. Padden. 2011. “The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language”.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
Thanks to ReCoS and the ERC Grant No. 269752 Rethinking Comparative Syntax!
But wait! [gl] in
, ... and [sh] in
Iconicity and arbitrariness
Some expressions are more iconic than others.
Animal noises, for example!
There is no obvious link between the sounds and the concept that they refer to.
The use of [tri:] for or [li:f] for is a matter of convention.
What about our “language of light”?
Signs can also be
The sounds used to indicate a meaning somehow express that meaning: e.g.
Can you think of an example?
We can try and find out more about iconicity and arbitrariness!
Let's keep on guessing...
And some more...
How does a British dog bark?
How would you describe the following sound?
Which one is more... well.. kiki?
In similar experiments, a large majority agrees.
We do have some idea of how to link sound and meaning...
Even iconic sounds are arbitrary.
Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language: a “young” language that is more iconic and not (yet!) conventionalised.
András Bárány, email@example.com —Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, ReCoS project
So? Is there a language of light?
Our hypothesis might have been wrong...
But there are iconic parts of language.
Signs are arbitrary and there is “duality of patterning”.
They are restricted by the inventory of sounds (or signs!).