Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Anth101 Global Fall2017

No description
by

Julie Jenkins

on 6 October 2017

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Anth101 Global Fall2017

Theorizing the Local & the Global
Global Forces, Local Lives

“refers to the world wide changes that are increasingly integrating and remolding the lives” of people around the world.

“objective and empirical PROCESS of increasing economic and political connectivity; a subjective PROCESS of unfolding consciousness as the collective awareness of growing global interconnectedness, and of specific globalizing projects that seek to shape global conditions.”
When did Globalization begin?
1400-1800- “European Expansion”
- more extensive global trade
Industrial Revolution & Colonialism- 1700s-1900s
Because of increased contact and movement of peoples, objects, ideas and integration in the political sphere--
are 'cultures' around the world becoming more similar?
Localization
Process of where ideas & objects are ‘localized’ into particular social structures and cultural systems of meaning.
What comes to mind when you hear the word globalization?
McDonaldization Theory:

McD's business principles is forming a specific kind of rationality that is spread to other sectors of life
-Efficient
-Calculable (fast & inexpensive to produce)
-Predictable
-Deskilled labor/ automation
But do need to pay attention to terms of change and the power relations involved
Theories of cultural homogeneity/imperialism/ Westernization/Americanization

--becoming more similar through...
...people have agency
-not just mindlessly adopting
our way of thinking and behaving is also affected by global interaction
hybridity-
blending of cultures
but...'hybridity' assumes the mixing of two 'pure' cultures
--never has existed
--blending upon blending upon blending upon blending....
--regional and long-distance trade
--diffusion of technologies, products & ideas
--Political changes, free trade, technological innovation have increased productivity and efficiency
--Enable competition and connect across vast distances
-- Result: world is ‘flat’- economic and social opportunities are increasingly available to all people regardless of geographical location

Globalization is an UNEVEN process
--not everyone has the same opportunities
--income inequality has increased- within nation-states & between nation-states
--Friedman sees 'tradition' as obstacle to 'progress'
--but...'tradition' really symbols/practices that are manipulated to serve present interests/needs
"tourist with an attitude"
Is this true??
historical process with different stages
Silk Road:
206 BC - 220 AD; 618 AD - 970 AD; 13th-14th Centuries
Out of Africa: AMH
200,000 years ago
Prior to 1400:
--recognize transcontinental migration
>14,000 years ago
"Clash of Civilizations"
Samuel Huntington
1993
--Post Cold War, conflict based on 'culture' & religion

--'civilizations' (super-cultures) vs nation states

--Western, Islamic, Latin American, Chinese, Hindu, Japanese, Orthodox, African
Why do civilizations clash?
1. historical, cultural difference
2. increasing interaction
3. Non-Western civilizations want to challenge West and influence world

What are the deadly sins of Huntington?
-stereotyping cultures
-ignoring change
-maligning Islam
-phony scientific methods
-the West is Best attitude
Is this true? Are there 'winners' & 'losers' in global integration?

What about the article on PNG may refute his idea?
Full transcript