Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

The CRAAP Test

Learn how to evaluate information using this easy, memorable acronym.

Adriana Parker

on 7 October 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of The CRAAP Test


It's a huge mountain . . .
of information.
Think of it as a pile of CRAAP.
You have just been assigned a
1st step:
Pick a topic
Ta da!
the end!
2nd step:
Find info
Last step:
what are you gonna do?
(cc) image by nuonsolarteam on Flickr
What about that second step?
Where are you gonna go to find information?

And off we go . . .
The thing about Google is
(That's an acronym, so it's not crass.)
Do this simple test whenever you're faced with new information
in order to determine if that information is "good."
Has it been
Does your topic required current info?
When was the information
published or posted?
(cc) photo by theaucitron on Flickr
(cc) photo by theaucitron on Flickr
Would older sources work?
Does the info answer your research question?
Is the info too simple or too advanced?
Who's the intended audience?
(cc) photo by theaucitron on Flickr
(cc) photo by theaucitron on Flickr
Have you looked at a variety of other sources?
Who is the author?
Is the author an expert ?
Is there contact information?
What does the URL
extension tell you?
(You know what I just realized, you guys?
These are CRAAP trees. Ew.)

Anyhow . . .
(cc) photo by theaucitron on Flickr
(cc) photo by theaucitron on Flickr
Where's the info from?
Is it supported
by evidence?
Is it peer-reviewed?
Can you find other
sources to validate it?
"Cosmetic" errors?
(cc) photo by theaucitron on Flickr
(cc) photo by theaucitron on Flickr
What' the purpose?
Is the purpose
clearly stated?
Is it fact-based?
Would you say
it's impartial?
Answer those questions,
Yes, all of them.
And you can consider that information
"good," or "valid," or "legitimate."

Well done, Smartypants.
Full transcript