Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

IR 382 - Lecture 1-4 Introduction to Order/Disorder and IR Theory

No description

Shannon Gibson

on 21 June 2016

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of IR 382 - Lecture 1-4 Introduction to Order/Disorder and IR Theory

Liberalism / Idealism
Structure = Anarchy
Main actor = still states
Change = Anarchy can be mitigated
Institutions (Collective Security)
Markets (Complex Interdependence)
Democratic Peace Theory
These can create shared interests and absolute gains
Future = progressive
Critiques anarchy and state centrality
Objective & normative
Actors = classes
Structure = Mode of Production
System = Conflictual bc of Capital which creates a hierarchical society:
Class (bourgeosie vs proletariat)
Colonial (Mother state vs colony)
Core-Periphery: North vs. South
Exploitation & Dependency
Thank you!
Structure = Anarchy
Main actors = States
Major assumptions:
Humans, by nature are selfish
States are unitary & rational
Balance of power
Relative gains & survival at any cost
World order = Competitive & conflictional
Future = cyclical
Introduction to Order/Disorder
IR 382 - Shannon Gibson, Ph.D.
Rejects material explanations
Takes a
approach to "reality"
IR is
mutually constitutive
Actors = states and non-state actors
Variable =
factors (norms)
System = Ever-changing
Theory Considered
Types of Theory
Objective ("Classic")
Subjective (Corrective)
Discursive (Critical)
Structure vs. Agency

Ontology vs. Epistemology
Ontology (n.) = the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being.
Epistemology (n.) = a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of knowledge.
How is knowledge obtained?
Radical / Discursive / Post Theories
overly "Western"
"failed states" and "underdevelopment"
Edward Said & "Orientalism"
"Order" vs. "Disorder"?
What conditions/situations perpetuate each?
State of the World today?
Structure = is the recurrent patterned arrangements which influence or limit the choices and opportunities available
Agency = is the capacity of individuals to act independently and to make their own free choices
This course is largely about this debate...how every day people battle the oppressive structures historically and today.
What is theory?
“Order is a term that carries normative and ideological connotations, as it bears particular conceptions about how social, political, and economic systems are and ought to be structured”
Debates within Realism
Hegemonic Stability Theory
What is Power?
Balance of Power - Mastaduno
"3 images of the Coming World Order"
increased economic competition
return to moltipolarity
American-centric order
Hard Power vs. Soft Power
basically the capability to make another state do something it would not otherwise do or to stop it from doing something it wants to do.
Postivism vs. Post-positivism
Explaining World Order :
"Anarchy is what states make of it."
focus on agency & structure
co-constitution rather than causation
focus on marginalization
deconstruct metanarratives
traditional theory preferences state too much
focuses on high politics
"Theory is always for someone and for some purpose."
Looking at the readings:
Michael Mastaduno: 3 Coming World Orders
Increased economic competition
Return to multipolarity (today's middle powers?)
American-centric order (US capabilities & Threat perception)
Doyle: Liberal Pacific Union
"can the liberal zone of peace be effectivel expanded without provoking unecessary danger and inflicting unnecessary harm?"
Argument: it should be expanded, but with caution
Steve Smith: 8 Questions about International Order
What is internationa "order"?
Why does it privelege the state?
Is order desirable?
Qs 4-6: Order, identity & exclussion
Assumptions of progress?
What does order mean in a globalized world?
Full transcript