Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Red Deer River

No description

Madison Kobryn

on 23 January 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Red Deer River

? Surprisingly little is known about how ecosystems respond longitudinally to effluent input Few studies try to identify the mechanisms that cause longitudinal patterns, and how they work to create these patterns The scale of the average lifetime dispersal distance of individuals in a population relative to the scale of abundance-determining environmental variation will determine how the population responds spatially to this variation (Anderson 2005) MOVEMENT OBJECTIVE #1 To document longitudinal patterns that occur in relation to effluent input (from the WWTP in the Red Deer River, AB, Canada) OBJECTIVE # 2 To evaluate whether insect abundance is affected (positively) by effluent addition

Hypothesized mechanism: nutrient enrichment releases constraints on the growth of primary producers, which in turn raises local carrying capacity for aquatic insect larvae, allowing higher abundances OBJECTIVE #3 Estimate the net long term movement of insects OBJECTIVE #4 Assess whether movement affects the spatial response of insects to the RDWWTP

Is it necessary to consider insect movements to adequately understand/ predict large scale abundance patterns? However, the long-term net movement of insects is virtually unknown! SAMPLING METHODS Bio Sciences Sample Processing NO3 (μg/L) Average water velocity (m/s) Distance downstream of WWTP (km) Average substrate particle size
(modified Wentworth scale) Distance downstream of WWTP (km) Distance downstream of WWTP (km) Periphyton Chl a (g/cm2) Distance downstream of WWTP (km) Distance downstream of WWTP (km) LOESS REGRESSIONS Baetis mid instar larvae (No./sample) Distance downstream of WWTP (km) Hydropsyche late instar larvae (No./sample) Distance downstream of WWTP (km) GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS WWTP-influenced variables:
NO3 concentration, Periphyton Chl a

Habitat / hydrological variables:
Substrate size, Flow velocity

+ 2-way interaction terms Poisson or negative binomial distribution

Log link function

Backwards elimination Total insect dry weight (g/m2) Total insect dry weight (g/m2) Baetis mid instar larvae (No./sample) Hydropsyche late instar larvae (No./sample) Distance downstream of WWTP (km) Distance downstream of WWTP (km) Distance downstream of WWTP (km) STABLE ISOTOPE ANALYSIS Wastewater effluent creates a natural marking experiment REANALYZING ENVIRONMENTAL PREDICTORS OF ABUNDANCE Using gradients in isotope signatures to infer movements FAMILY ASSEMBLAGE SPATIAL STRUCTURE Similarities in communities through space can provide clues about:

the scale of internal processes, such as movement, that affect distribution and abundance
how external forces drive distribution and abundance Spatial dependence on external linear gradient "Single bump" spatial structure (Legendre and Legendre 2012) Scaling population responses to spatial environmental variability in advection-dominated systems (Anderson et al. 2005) With independent variables averaged over various lags
and/or the inclusion of a spatial variance-covariance matrix A consideration of environmental conditions in areas larger than the site of sampling improves the prediction of abundance in some cases, and doesn't decrease fit in others From previous discussions... Input from the WWTP appears to affect large scale abundance patterns Mantel correlograms: depict spatial autocorrelation structure in multivariate data NO3 Stable isotope signatures suggest that downstream movement on the scale of a few km per month is probable, yet... Large scale spatial structure in family assemblages seems to be driven by large scale gradients in environmental factors rather than internal processes such as movement A large scale downstream lag in total abundance as compared to "potential primary productivity" is not evident Because downstream movement can effectively spread the numerical response of a population downstream from the conditions it is responding to Freshwater systems are increasingly impacted by the addition of nutrient rich effluent from WWTPs The effects of these inputs cascade through river ecosystems Sampled invertebrate and periphyton at 41 sites on the Red Deer River in August, 2010

Measured various physical and chemical parameters The response of insects to wastewater effluent in the Red Deer River:
A spatial perspective Madison Kobryn Linear trends (Non-parametric spline)
cross-correlation Residuals * ** ** * * * But local-scale analysis
did a good job explaining
local abundance Future Directions Finer-scale sampling Spatial variation in trophic fractionation Different resource pools Further
modelling efforts
Full transcript