Solutions
Pricing
Log in
Teams
Get started
Log in
Get started
Harmony Research
CB
by
Christina Burks
·
2 views
·
Updated Sep 25, 2021
Share
Embed
Create your own
Chapters
00:00
Chapter 1
00:57
Chapter 2
01:32
Chapter 3
02:27
Chapter 4
02:29
Chapter 5
03:00
Chapter 6
03:01
Chapter 7
03:44
Chapter 8
03:53
Chapter 9
Audio Transcript
Auto-generated
00:01 - 00:04
Brown versus the Board of Education was my first case
00:07 - 00:09
In 1950 Linda Brown and her sister.
00:11 - 00:14
We're in the midst of separate but equal because of
00:15 - 00:17
this world hurt her and her sister.
00:19 - 00:22
We're putting a lot of difficult situations just to get
00:22 - 00:23
to their black school.
00:25 - 00:27
They even had to go through the railroad tracks.
00:30 - 00:33
Both of them found that having to walk along dangerous
00:33 - 00:37
distance even though there was a school close by to
00:37 - 00:38
their house was unnecessary.
00:39 - 00:41
But due to the fact that it was a all
00:42 - 00:46
white school, they could not go Let me realize that
00:46 - 00:49
the whole separate but equal was against their rights.
00:50 - 00:53
And the 14th Amendment Linda Brown and her family decided
00:54 - 01:00
to take their case to the Federal District Court when
01:00 - 01:03
the brown family brought their case to the court's attention.
01:04 - 01:06
The decision was set yeah.
01:08 - 01:16
In public education, separate, but equal was harmon to black
01:17 - 01:22
Children. But the segregation was legal because all black schools
01:23 - 01:29
and white schools had similar buildings, transportation curricula and teachers
01:38 - 01:42
after the brown case was basically shut down due to
01:42 - 01:46
the federal courts beliefs that even though they were separate,
01:47 - 01:49
they still were, gave them equal supplies.
01:51 - 01:51
The browns.
01:53 - 01:59
The browns statement was that if they're separate, there's no
02:00 - 02:00
way right.
02:01 - 02:11
They have equal supplies in any way the Supreme Court
02:12 - 02:19
decided, uh, the separate but equal, Why Was violating the
02:19 - 02:21
protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
02:23 - 02:28
My second cases dread scott versus stanford.
02:32 - 02:38
In this case, In 1830 for a form of slave
02:39 - 02:42
was moved to a free state of Illinois, just got
02:42 - 02:47
believed since he was in a free state, he should
02:47 - 02:53
no longer be identified as a slave or being owned.
02:56 - 02:59
So he decides to take his case to the court.
03:05 - 03:09
Judge scott also want to see the widow of his
03:09 - 03:16
former slave owner, but the Supreme Court decided that since
03:16 - 03:22
dread scott was not from to a noise, he was
03:22 - 03:25
not considered a citizen of the state.
03:26 - 03:29
So I had no jurisdiction in the matter, even if
03:29 - 03:36
he was in a slave free state and he couldn't
03:37 - 03:38
claim any of those rights.
03:42 - 03:51
and my 3rd case is okay bro, Fell versus Hodges.
03:56 - 03:59
This is a case based on mirror In the 1970s,
04:01 - 04:04
the Contents of Marriage was perceptive that has between one
04:04 - 04:05
woman and one man.
04:07 - 04:11
This case was significant and ran due to the fact
04:11 - 04:15
the only marriage case ever took into the court was
04:15 - 04:22
about interracial marrying many voices and advocates for the L
04:22 - 04:27
G B T Q community stood up for the last
04:28 - 04:34
for their laws inequality to be equal according to the
04:34 - 04:40
source. It states the Supreme Court World or decided that
04:41 - 04:45
the 14th Amendment requires all states to grant same sex
04:45 - 04:49
marriages and recognize same sex marriages printed in other states.
04:51 - 04:55
These are all the of my cases that I did
04:55 - 04:55
research on
See full transcript