Robot Perso

MF
by Michel Fawaz1 view·Updated Dec 16, 2021
Create your own

Chapters

Audio TranscriptAuto-generated

  1. Hi, guys.
  2. My name is Michelle Pfeiffer was And this is my presentation called Robot Person.
  3. So for the introduction, this is my research question.
  4. What legal status should be offered to artificial intelligence?
  5. In addition to that, liability issues are important in this area.
  6. Who is responsible for damage caused by a
  7. so a new species.
  8. Uh,
  9. this must be understood as a machine capable of making a
  10. decision that does not in itself result from autonomous systems.
  11. It is the autonomy that returns our civilisation upside
  12. down and announces the arrival of a new species,
  13. which I called the robot person.
  14. So drawing inspiration from the status of animals and the Western legal system, uh,
  15. they recognise a technical be partition in two big groups.
  16. The people and the things.
  17. A separate legal status. I'm sure we've all heard about this robot.
  18. Uh, and we watched YouTube video about her in class.
  19. She's the first robot obtained, uh, legal personality.
  20. So a responsibility that will evolve.
  21. We must take into account the Expo exponential progress of AI,
  22. especially through machine learning method that allows a machine to
  23. evolve on its own thanks to the automated learning process.
  24. So the laws of robotics,
  25. artificial intelligence at the service of Better Justice.
  26. Uh,
  27. quantitative analysis of court decisions and the answer in
  28. anticipation of possible decisions could make it possible to,
  29. uh, to satisfy the imperative of speed of justice.
  30. So the increase in law through automation.
  31. An example for that is the robot lawyer Rose.
  32. He's the first robot lawyer to join an American law firm.
  33. The development of software capable of providing legal documents
  34. like the robot trust robots, materialised or not, are for the moment,
  35. not capable of producing real cognitive reasoning
  36. and of showing real empathy,
  37. which therefore remain the prerogative of humans,
  38. artificial intelligence and the risk of diminished right.
  39. While the advent of increased right seems to constitute a
  40. real opportunity for the legal professions and for the law,
  41. this opportunity should not obscure the
  42. indisputable risks that this technology entails,
  43. uh, the risk of mutation of our legal system.
  44. If artificial intelligence makes it possible to measure with more precision,
  45. the characteristics of the case law of the court, a judge,
  46. a litigation does not this measure risk modifying the case law.
  47. Thus,
  48. if the tools at his disposal allow a judge to compare
  49. his practise in terms of compensation or compensate Ori allowance.
  50. This comparison his practise will evolve and tend towards
  51. harmonisation or even a standardisation of practises towards robots.
  52. So the risks of a justice judged and laws of authority,
  53. even if the justice rendered, is, uh,
  54. justice that satisfies the requirements of a Fairchild for robots,
  55. their appearance of good justice is essential for
  56. the acceptance of court decisions by litigants.
  57. So in conclusion, when faced with fragmented or inadequate pre existing regimes,
  58. the creation of a new legal personality appeared
  59. to be the easiest solution to implement.
  60. And here we can see my out chat if anyone wants to read it, Thank you.