Sources
Kittelson, James M., and Hans H. Wiersma. Luther the Reformer: The Story of the Man and His Career, Second Edition. 2nd ed., 1517 Media, 2016. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1b3t7ps. Accessed 23 Jan. 2021.
Russell, William R., and Timothy F. Lull, editors. “The Babylonian Captivity of the Church—Part I (1520).” Martin Luther's Basic Theological Writings: Third Edition, 3rd ed., 1517 Media, Minneapolis, 2012, pp. 196–223. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt22h6s70.29. Accessed 23 Jan. 2021.
Russell, William R., and Timothy F. Lull, editors. “The Small Catechism (1529).” Martin Luther's Basic Theological Writings: Third Edition, 3rd ed., 1517 Media, Minneapolis, 2012, pp. 322–339. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt22h6s70.38. Accessed 23 Jan. 2021.
Audio TranscriptAuto-generated
Hello. Welcome to Luther, the Lord's Supper.
What it is and what it is not today.
We're gonna focus on what it was that Luther saw
wrong with the way that the church was experiencing the
Eucharist and what Luther taught that the Lord's Supper is
so, first of all, we want to take a look
at what Luther identified as being wrong with how it
was currently being celebrated, being taught, being experienced by the
church and by the people.
First of all, the Lord's supper is not a sacrifice
or a good work.
The Catholic Mass, which was the service that was really
focused around the Eucharist, the act of communion, the sacrament,
um, was considered it and still is in the Catholic
Church, considered a sacrifice and a good work.
And the biggest issue that Luther had with this is
that it was necessary to understand that the sacrament of
communion was a gift, a gift that we reach Onley
through a faith that is given to us by God.
Therefore, it is not a work of our doing or
by any human doing.
Therefore, it is not a good work on our part
or a sacrifice on our part, and Luther thought that
this was this was crucial to understanding sacraments.
It was crucial to understanding God and crucial the understanding
faith. So, first of all, the Lord's Supper is not
a sacrifice or a good work.
Second of all, the Lord's Supper is not for priests
alone. Now I want to clarify.
Here, the Catholic Church did not teach that the Lord's
supper was for priests alone.
What they did, however, practice was that the blood or
the wine was on Lee.
For clergy, it was not for the lay members.
And so when the lady experienced communion, they would Onley
receive the bread or the host if they received anything
at all.
They also practiced, um, what was eating with their eyes
or experiencing communion just by watching it take place on
by watching the priests partake in the blood and the
body. So Luther specifically says there is.
There is nothing scripturally that says that we should be
limiting the the consumption of the blood from anyone.
Instead, both the blood and the body are shed for
all, as the words in Scripture read.
So these were the two important things among some other
things that Lou they're very specifically wanted his followers to
understand. This is not the case.
This is not what the Lord's supper is.
So then we want to know what the Lord's supper
is. So we're gonna highlight two things here specifically that
Luther focused on.
First of all, it's a sacrament.
Now understand that in the Catholic Church it is also
a sacrament.
But the understanding of what a sacrament is in the
Catholic Church and according toa Luther or 22 different things.
Um, so we're gonna focus on what Luther expresses as
a sacrament.
And what Luther expresses as a sacrament is, um it's
an act where we take an element, unearthly element in
this case, the element of wine and bread.
And we pair it with the words of God.
And so you'll notice in the image.
Here we have scripture open up, right.
We have the word of God, and the words of
God are also what we call the words of institution.
This is my body broken for you, so that makes
it a sacrament.
So that's an important thing.
There are only two sacraments.
According to Luther, Baptism is one of them and communion
or the Lord's Supper is the other one.
So it was a big deal that this was one
of them.
As the Catholic Church holds seven sacraments, Luther claimed that
there were only two, and this is one of them
now. The second part of this that's that's crucial to
Luther's teaching of the Lord's supper is that within the
bread and the wine, the body and the blood is
the true presence of Jesus Christ.
Now this is confusing because he argued that this was
different from what the Catholic Church was teaching.
The Catholic Church teaches something called trans substantiation, and the
transubstantiation means that by the act of the words of
the priest, the body or the wine and the bread
turn into the blood and the blood and the body
of Christ and are eternally those elements now.
That's not exactly how Luther teaches it, but what he
says is that with the word of God so not
because of the word of God or after the word
of God has spoken, but with the word of God.
The presence of Christ is in with and under these
elements, so they don't change into something they're not.
They're not eternally turned into something else after these words
have been spoken, but rather the elements with the word
are the true presence of Christ.
Now that's how it differs slightly from the Catholic understanding
of this.
But more specifically, Luther was faced with pushback from many
of the people who agreed with many of the doctrines
that he was teaching but differed on this particular one.
And one of the one of the people who was
prominent in that was a man by the name of
Swingley and the church in hopes of kind of, um,
building up alliances together or holding strong together and building.
One church wanted Luther and Swingley to agree, and on
most accounts they could agree.
And what it all came down to was what The
Lord's Supper?
Waas and Swingley thought that the Lord's Supper was a
wonderful practice, an important practice that is commanded for us
in Scripture, and it is a great symbol that points
to the cross, and Luther would not agree with that
statement. Luther was strong and holding to the fact that
it is not a symbol, and the sacrament of communion
does not point to Christ, but rather the sacrament is
the presence of Christ.
So this is an important teaching of Luther as it
really separated Luther from not only the Catholics but also
from many other evangelical movements that that occurred because of
the Reformation.
So hopefully now you have a better understanding of exactly
what Luther's teachings were in accordance to the Lord's supper