Solutions
Pricing
Log in
Teams
Get started
Log in
Get started
What is income inequality?
MN
by
Matt Nolan
·
1 view
·
Updated May 29, 2021
Share
Embed
Create your own
Chapters
00:00
Chapter 1
00:35
Chapter 2
01:10
Chapter 3
01:55
Chapter 4
02:37
Chapter 5
03:05
Chapter 6
03:32
Chapter 7
03:38
Chapter 8
03:39
Chapter 9
04:32
Chapter 10
04:41
Chapter 11
05:01
Chapter 12
05:26
Chapter 13
06:06
Chapter 14
06:07
Chapter 15
06:42
Chapter 16
06:43
Chapter 17
07:10
Chapter 18
Audio Transcript
Auto-generated
00:00 - 00:03
Yeah. Hi, everyone met and I both have done some
00:03 - 00:05
research in the past on income and wealth inequality.
00:06 - 00:08
So today we thought it would be interesting to talk
00:09 - 00:13
about stay to income inequality and introduce the common measure
00:13 - 00:14
of it, the gini coefficient.
00:15 - 00:18
So we'll talk about that today and I'm here to
00:18 - 00:18
run the slides.
00:19 - 00:20
So there we go.
00:22 - 00:25
So to start, I would like to discuss some of
00:25 - 00:29
the reasons why income might be in equal at a
00:29 - 00:31
point in time, which I think will help us understand
00:33 - 00:33
these measures.
00:34 - 00:40
So first experienced versus inexperienced workers, let's think about the
00:40 - 00:45
situation where someone is experienced within the industry for 20
00:45 - 00:47
years versus someone entering the industry.
00:49 - 00:53
The person who's experienced has built up skills and know
00:53 - 00:57
how about the job, so he's likely to be paid
00:57 - 01:00
more than someone who is completely new.
01:00 - 01:04
So if this was the reason why incomes were unequal,
01:05 - 01:08
we might we may not be worried about it too
01:08 - 01:14
much. The second scenario is risk taking versus non risk
01:14 - 01:19
taking individuals, someone who is willing to take a risk
01:19 - 01:24
by undertaking uncertain investments and take chances that may end
01:25 - 01:25
up with nothing.
01:25 - 01:28
Or may they may end up with lots of income.
01:29 - 01:31
This could lead to inequality as well.
01:32 - 01:37
Furthermore, on average, risk takers have to be rewarded to
01:37 - 01:37
do this.
01:38 - 01:42
So there may be inequality due to some individuals being
01:42 - 01:46
more willing to accept a lower income as long as
01:46 - 01:48
they don't have to take on risks.
01:48 - 01:53
Again, this would be would be seemed to be okay.
01:53 - 01:54
Reason for inequality.
01:56 - 02:02
The third scenario is people when people have different opportunities
02:03 - 02:07
or there may be discrimination or systemic biases in society
02:08 - 02:11
that lead to people who are otherwise the same, receiving
02:12 - 02:13
different incomes.
02:14 - 02:17
So when this happens, the inequality appears to be a
02:17 - 02:19
very fundamentally unjust.
02:20 - 02:23
So it would be something that we would want to
02:23 - 02:26
redress two, summarizing these pictures.
02:27 - 02:31
Uh these different causes matter in very different ways.
02:32 - 02:35
So we would like to think about policy very differently
02:35 - 02:37
based on the causes.
02:37 - 02:42
However, our measure don't, our measures don't always allow us
02:43 - 02:44
to separate out these causes.
02:45 - 02:48
So today, our goal is not to talk about whether
02:48 - 02:49
inequality is good or bad.
02:50 - 02:54
We just want to describe what the inequality is.
02:55 - 02:58
The issues of the inequality being good or bad are
02:59 - 03:01
described more at the T V H.
03:01 - 03:05
E link that you're seeing at a top of your
03:05 - 03:12
screen. So the parade of dwarfs, we're looking at an
03:12 - 03:12
income distribution.
03:13 - 03:17
We can consider it by ordering people from those with
03:17 - 03:20
the lowest income to those with the highest and popping
03:21 - 03:25
them on a graph when we do so we get
03:26 - 03:29
the so called the parades parade of dwarfs.
03:30 - 03:31
Let's look at it alone.
03:34 - 03:35
Oops the wrong parade.
03:36 - 03:36
Just a second.
03:37 - 03:38
I will fix that now.
03:39 - 03:45
Yeah. So This is Queen Kyle's in New Zealand which
03:46 - 03:49
is the proportion of income for each 20% of the
03:49 - 03:52
population ordered by the income level.
03:53 - 03:56
The income measure us here is household equalised income.
03:57 - 03:59
Why we equalize the income?
04:00 - 04:03
Because we would view a child or non worker in
04:03 - 04:06
a high income family as still having a high income
04:07 - 04:09
as the family will share the resources.
04:10 - 04:14
So we group people in the household together and then
04:14 - 04:18
adjust the income for the number of people and how
04:18 - 04:21
those people could share the income which is called scale
04:22 - 04:27
economies. This shows us the proportion of income rises over
04:28 - 04:31
five times, going from the lowest to the highest quintile.
04:34 - 04:39
However, having such large groupings missing misses a lot of
04:39 - 04:41
inequality. Let's look at the U.
04:41 - 04:41
S. Case.
04:43 - 04:47
The US figure shows that clearly the very high income
04:47 - 04:50
earners tower far above the wrist.
04:51 - 04:54
This is why it's termed the parade of dwarfs as
04:55 - 04:58
a few high income people earn far more than each
04:59 - 05:01
individual other person in the distribution.
05:03 - 05:07
So let's imagine a situation where everyone does earn the
05:07 - 05:08
same income.
05:08 - 05:10
The parade would be fled.
05:10 - 05:14
In that case if we have people ordered from lowest
05:15 - 05:15
to highest income.
05:16 - 05:19
Which doesn't make sense when they are all the same.
05:19 - 05:24
But we'll soon we can look at cumulative income in
05:24 - 05:25
the following way.
05:26 - 05:27
So let's draw the line.
05:29 - 05:32
The idea is that we start with the person with
05:32 - 05:36
the lowest income and the second point is their income
05:37 - 05:39
plus the income of the second lowest earner.
05:40 - 05:43
If we keep adding this up we will get a
05:43 - 05:45
straight line At the end.
05:45 - 05:48
We will have 100% of the people, the bottom axis
05:49 - 05:52
and 100% of the income, the left hand side access.
05:53 - 05:57
So the line is straight as the additions to the
05:57 - 06:01
cumulative some are always the same number when incomes are
06:01 - 06:02
perfectly equal.
06:03 - 06:06
But what does it look like when they are unequal?
06:08 - 06:10
So the next line is famous.
06:11 - 06:15
Lawrence curve, the proportion of total income earned by lower
06:15 - 06:19
income individuals will be lower than this perfectly equal line.
06:20 - 06:21
As the income rises.
06:22 - 06:28
When we go right, The line gradually gets steeper by
06:28 - 06:31
the end we will have 100% of the income counted
06:32 - 06:34
again. So we end up, we end up at the
06:35 - 06:35
same point.
06:35 - 06:38
So this is called the Lorenz curve.
06:40 - 06:42
So how do we measure inequality from this?
06:42 - 06:45
We measure it using the gini coefficient.
06:46 - 06:50
The gini coefficient is a measure that refers to the
06:50 - 06:55
gap between this completely equal line and unequal line that
06:55 - 06:56
is observed in reality.
06:57 - 07:00
So the larger the Gini coefficient, the larger the area
07:01 - 07:02
between these two lines.
07:03 - 07:06
So it is in this way that the gini coefficient
07:07 - 07:09
measures inequality in incomes in the population.
07:10 - 07:13
Mhm. Right, here we go.
07:13 - 07:16
So today we have had a brief chat about how
07:16 - 07:20
to measure income inequality and have hopefully clarified what people
07:21 - 07:24
mean when they talk about the gini coefficient, questions about
07:25 - 07:28
what the right level of inequality is or what inequality
07:29 - 07:30
really means, tough.
07:31 - 07:34
So um these are not things we are going to
07:35 - 07:36
tackle here in this video.
07:37 - 07:40
We just wanted to give you some information to help
07:40 - 07:41
you make your own informed choices.
07:42 - 07:45
So we will thank you here and hopefully we'll see
07:45 - 07:46
you next time.
See full transcript